Paper · 2012 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans

V Ramalakshmi; G.M.V. Prasada Rao; T. Madhumathi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among the insecticides tested, fipronil 5% SC @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 and fipronil 80% WG @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 were effective in managing leafhopper with a population reduction of 70.9% and 67.6%, respectively at 10 days after treatment. Next best treatments were diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 375 g a.i. ha−1 and buprofezin 25% SC @150 g a.i. ha−1 followed by acephate 75 SP @ 750 g a.i./ha and imidacloprid 70% WG @ 21 g a.i/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5% SC at 50 g a.i. ha-1 reduced the leafhopper population by 70.9% at 10 days after treatment.

Treatment
fipronil 5% SC @ 50 g a.i. ha−1e0
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
population reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“fipronil 5% SC @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 and fipronil 80% WG @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 were effective in managing leafhopper with a population reduction of 70.9% and 67.6%, respectively at 10 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 80% WG at 50 g a.i. ha-1 reduced the leafhopper population by 67.6% at 10 days after treatment.

Treatment
fipronil 80% WG @ 50 g a.i. ha−1e0
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
population reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“fipronil 5% SC @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 and fipronil 80% WG @ 50 g a.i. ha−1 were effective in managing leafhopper with a population reduction of 70.9% and 67.6%, respectively at 10 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diafenthiuron 50% WP at 375 g a.i. ha-1 was among the next best treatments against the leafhopper after fipronil.

Treatment
diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 375 g a.i. ha−1e1
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
Next best treatmentse1
Direction
Next best treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Next best treatments were diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 375 g a.i. ha−1 and buprofezin 25% SC @150 g a.i. ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin 25% SC at 150 g a.i. ha-1 was among the next best treatments against the leafhopper after fipronil.

Treatment
buprofezin 25% SC @150 g a.i. ha−1e1
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
Next best treatmentse1
Direction
Next best treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Next best treatments were diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 375 g a.i. ha−1 and buprofezin 25% SC @150 g a.i. ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate 75 SP at 750 g a.i. ha-1 followed the best treatments in managing the leafhopper.

Treatment
acephate 75 SP @ 750 g a.i./hae2
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
followed bye2
Direction
followed bye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by acephate 75 SP @ 750 g a.i./ha and imidacloprid 70% WG @ 21 g a.i/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 70% WG at 21 g a.i. ha-1 followed the best treatments in managing the leafhopper.

Treatment
imidacloprid 70% WG @ 21 g a.i/hae2
Interactor
Amrasca devastanst0pest
Outcome
followed bye2
Direction
followed bye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against Cotton Leafhopper, Amrasca devastans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by acephate 75 SP @ 750 g a.i./ha and imidacloprid 70% WG @ 21 g a.i/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–411 · show in text ↑

fipronil · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.