Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Comparative Efficacy of Rock Phosphate Enriched Organic Fertilizer vs. Mineral Phosphatic Fertilizer for Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Lentil

Allah Ditta; Muhammad Arshad; Zahir A. Zahir; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Optimum impregnation ratio of rock phosphate (RP) and compost in RP-enriched organic fertilizer, its time and rate of application to the crop plants affect the availability of nutrients through the process of mineralization and immobilization. A series of pot and field experiments were conducted to investigate the comparative efficacy of RP-enriched organic fertilizer vs. mineral phosphatic fertilizer on growth, yield and nodulation of lentil. Optimum impregnation ratio of RP and compost and the time of application to improve growth, nodulation and yield of lentil were investigated under wire house conditions. The impregnation ratio of 50:50 RP and compost and time of application of seven days before sowing resulted in the maximum nodulation, growth and yield parameters compared to the other impregnation ratios and the times of application. Optimized impregnation ratio and time of application were further investigated for optimum rate of application under field conditions to enhance nodulation, growth and yield of lentil in comparison with recommended mineral phosphatic fertilizer. The application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 showed an increase of 35.5, 27 and 6% in number of nodules, fresh weight of nodules, and grain yield compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer, respectively. Similarly, significant increase in P contents of straw and grain was also observed with the application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer. However, the effect of the application of 800 and 1000 kg ha -1 was statistically non-significant for most of the parameters studied. The results suggested that RP-enriched organic fertilizer with optimum impregnation ratio of RP and compost, time of application and rate of application had a pronounced effect on nodulation, growth and yield of lentil as compared to recommended chemical phosphatic fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50:50 impregnation ratio applied seven days before sowing maximized nodulation, growth and yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
50:50 RP and compost and time of application of seven days before sowinge0
Outcome
nodulation, growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
the other impregnation ratios and the times of applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impregnation ratio of 50:50 RP and compost and time of application of seven days before sowing resulted in the maximum nodulation, growth and yield parameters compared to the other impregnation ratios and the times of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased lentil nodule number 35.5% versus chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35.5e0
Comparator
chemical phosphatic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 showed an increase of 35.5, 27 and 6% in number of nodules, fresh weight of nodules, and grain yield compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased lentil nodule fresh weight 27%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
fresh weight of nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27e0
Comparator
chemical phosphatic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 showed an increase of 35.5, 27 and 6% in number of nodules, fresh weight of nodules, and grain yield compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased lentil grain yield 6%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
chemical phosphatic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 showed an increase of 35.5, 27 and 6% in number of nodules, fresh weight of nodules, and grain yield compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer significantly increased straw and grain phosphorus contents.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
P contents of straw and graine0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
chemical phosphatic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in P contents of straw and grain was also observed with the application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 800 and 1000 kg fertilizer rates did not differ significantly for most studied parameters.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
application of 800e0
Outcome
most of the parameters studiede0
Comparator
1000 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the application of 800 and 1000 kg ha -1 was statistically non-significant for most of the parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.