Abstract
The respected field study comprising of five treatments of different solid and newly introduced liquid fertilizers was carried out at Sugarcane Research Institute, Faisalabad during two successive growing seasons of 2004-2005 and 2005-06. Experiment was planned to explore the effect of both fertilizer forms (solid and liquid) on the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of spring planted sugarcane variety SPF-245 that was used in the reported investigation. The results obtained showed that germination, CCS and sugar recovery, were not significantly effected while tillers per plant, number of millable canes, cane yield, and sugar yield were significantly effected by various fertilizer combinations in different treatments. Higher number of millable canes (110.20), cane yield (72.93 t/ha) and sugar yield (9.14 t/ha) were observed in that treatment where solid fertilizers in vogue were applied while other treatments, except control, produced lower results with respect to these parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer combinations did not significantly affect germination, CCS or sugar recovery.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- various fertilizer combinationse0
- Outcome
- germination, CCS and sugar recoverye0
- Direction
- not significantly effectede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“germination, CCS and sugar recovery, were not significantly effected while tillers per plant, number of millable canes, cane yield, and sugar yield were significantly effected by various fertilizer combinations in different treatments”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer combinations significantly affected tillers per plant.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“tillers per plant, number of millable canes, cane yield, and sugar yield were significantly effected by various fertilizer combinations in different treatments”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Solid fertilizer gave the higher millable cane number, 110.20.
Verbatim
e0“Higher number of millable canes (110.20), cane yield (72.93 t/ha) and sugar yield (9.14 t/ha) were observed in that treatment where solid fertilizers in vogue were applied while other treatments, except control, produced lower results with respect to these parameters”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Solid fertilizer gave higher cane yield of 72.93 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Higher number of millable canes (110.20), cane yield (72.93 t/ha) and sugar yield (9.14 t/ha) were observed in that treatment where solid fertilizers in vogue were applied while other treatments, except control, produced lower results with respect to these parameters”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Solid fertilizer gave higher sugar yield of 9.14 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Higher number of millable canes (110.20), cane yield (72.93 t/ha) and sugar yield (9.14 t/ha) were observed in that treatment where solid fertilizers in vogue were applied while other treatments, except control, produced lower results with respect to these parameters”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.