Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Evaluation of castor (Ricinus communis) genotypes for productivity, economics, litter fall and changes in soil properties under different levels of inter-row spacing and nitrogen

D.S. RANA; G. GlRl; D.K. PACHAUR

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A fixed plot field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2002 and 2003 at New Delhi, to find out the effect of 3 inter-row spacings (60, 75 and 90 cm) and 3 levels of N (0, 60 and 120 kg Nlha) on per- formance of 2 genotypes ('DCH 177' and 'DCS 9') of castor (Ricinus communis L.) and physico-chemical proper- ties of soil. The mean performance indicated significant superiority of 'DCH 177' to 'DCS 9' in terms of yield at- tributes, seed yield (27.7 and 23.9 qlha), harvest index (9.59 and 8.92%) and net return (Rs 24,072 and 20,6561 ha). The optimum N dose was worked out to be 121.6 and 108.9 kg Nlha for 'DCH 177' and 'DCS 9' respectively. Castor genotypes responded to inter-row spacing significantly. The maximum seed yield (26.5 qlha), harvest in- dex (9.72%) and net return (Rs 23,420lha) were recorded with 98 cm inter-row spacing. Low temperature during December to February induced considerable fruits drop. The treatments under test also caused perceptible variation in fruits drop. Mean litter fall of 9 to 10 tonneslha per season was recorded. Litter fall exhibited marked increase due to decrease in inter-row spacing and increase in N levels. At the end of 2 years experimentation on the same site, physico-chemical properties like bulk density and pH recorded perceptible decrease from initial values, while soil organic carbon content and available N exhibited marked improvement over initial values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DCH 177 was significantly superior to DCS 9 in yield attributes, seed yield, harvest index, and net return.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Material
'DCH 177'e0
Outcome
yield at- tributese0
Comparator
'DCS 9'e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant superiority of 'DCH 177' to 'DCS 9' in terms of yield at- tributes, seed yield (27.7 and 23.9 qlha), harvest index (9.59 and 8.92%) and net return (Rs 24,072 and 20,6561 ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCH 177 seed yield was 27.7 qlha versus 23.9 qlha for DCS 9.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
27.7 and 23.9 qlhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (27.7 and 23.9 qlha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCH 177 harvest index was 9.59% versus 8.92% for DCS 9.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Value
9.59 and 8.92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (9.59 and 8.92%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCH 177 net return was Rs 24,072 versus Rs 20,6561 ha for DCS 9.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs 24,072 and 20,6561 hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (Rs 24,072 and 20,6561 ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen dose for DCH 177 was 121.6 kg Nlha.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Material
'DCH 177'e0
Outcome
optimum N dosee0
Value
121.6 and 108.9 kg Nlhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum N dose was worked out to be 121.6 and 108.9 kg Nlha for 'DCH 177' and 'DCS 9' respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen dose for DCS 9 was 108.9 kg Nlha.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Material
'DCS 9'e0
Outcome
optimum N dosee0
Value
121.6 and 108.9 kg Nlhae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum N dose was worked out to be 121.6 and 108.9 kg Nlha for 'DCH 177' and 'DCS 9' respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor genotypes responded significantly to inter-row spacing.

Treatment
inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
responded to inter-row spacinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Castor genotypes responded to inter-row spacing significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 98 cm spacing, maximum seed yield was 26.5 qlha.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
98 cm inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
maximum seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
26.5 qlhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield (26.5 qlha), harvest in- dex (9.72%) and net return (Rs 23,420lha) were recorded with 98 cm inter-row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 98 cm spacing, maximum harvest index was 9.72%.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
98 cm inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
harvest in- dexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield (26.5 qlha), harvest in- dex (9.72%) and net return (Rs 23,420lha) were recorded with 98 cm inter-row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 98 cm spacing, maximum net return was Rs 23,420lha.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
98 cm inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 23,420lhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield (26.5 qlha), harvest in- dex (9.72%) and net return (Rs 23,420lha) were recorded with 98 cm inter-row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature from December to February induced considerable fruit drop.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
Low temperature during December to Februarye0
Outcome
fruits drope0
Qualifier
considerablee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperature during December to February induced considerable fruits drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested treatments also varied fruit drop.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
treatments under teste0
Outcome
fruits drope0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments under test also caused perceptible variation in fruits drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean litter fall was 9 to 10 tonneslha per season.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Outcome
litter falle0
Value
9 to 10 tonneslha per seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean litter fall of 9 to 10 tonneslha per season was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced inter-row spacing increased litter fall.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
decrease in inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
Litter falle0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Litter fall exhibited marked increase due to decrease in inter-row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen levels increased litter fall.

Taxon
castor (Ricinus communis)Ricinus communist0
Treatment
increase in N levelse0
Outcome
increase in N levelse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor (Ricinus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density and pH decreased after two years on the site.

Outcome
bulk density and pHe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“bulk density and pH recorded perceptible decrease from initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon and available nitrogen improved after two years.

Outcome
soil organic carbon content and available Ne0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic carbon content and available N exhibited marked improvement over initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1443 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.