Paper · 1997 · Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)

Effect of intergenotypic competition on yield assessment in cowpea trials

Shiv Kumar; S. N. Mishra

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Study on the effect of intergenotypic competition in cowpea revealed significant differences among cultivars for their competitive ability. Competition caused significant changes in the relative performance of cultivars with regard to the characters studied except pod length and number of seeds per pod. For seed yield, the average competition was the major source of bias in single-row plots. Estimates of the average competition effects and average expected bias for seed yield indicated that an aggressive competitor was over estimated in competition, whereas a poor competitor was under estimated. Negative correlation between yielding and competing abilities of cultivars suggest the need for bordered plots in yield evaluation trials of cowpea. Since pod length and number of seeds per pod were unaffected by competition, they could be beller selection criteria for yield in single-row plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea cultivars differed significantly in competitive ability.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
competitive abilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Study on the effect of intergenotypic competition in cowpea revealed significant differences among cultivars for their competitive ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition significantly changed relative cultivar performance except pod length and seed number per pod.

Treatment
Competitione0t0
Outcome
relative performance of cultivarse0t0
Direction
changese0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition caused significant changes in the relative performance of cultivars with regard to the characters studied except pod length and number of seeds per pod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average competition was the major bias source for seed yield in single-row plots.

Outcome
source of biase0t0
Qualifier
single-row plotse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For seed yield, the average competition was the major source of bias in single-row plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressive competitors had overestimated seed yield in competition.

Material
aggressive competitore0t0
Outcome
over estimatede0t0
Direction
over estimatede0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an aggressive competitor was over estimated in competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poor competitors had underestimated seed yield in competition.

Material
poor competitore0t0
Outcome
under estimatede0t0
Direction
under estimatede0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a poor competitor was under estimated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yielding and competing abilities were negatively correlated.

Material
cultivarse0t0
Outcome
yielding and competing abilitiese0t0
Direction
Negativee0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Negative correlation between yielding and competing abilities of cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordered plots are recommended for cowpea yield evaluation.

Outcome
bordered plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggest the need for bordered plots in yield evaluation trials of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod length and seeds per pod were unaffected by competition.

Treatment
competitione0t0
Outcome
pod length and number of seeds per pode0t0
Direction
unaffectede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod length and number of seeds per pod were unaffected by competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod length and seeds per pod may be better selection criteria in single-row plots.

Outcome
beller selection criteriae0t0
Qualifier
single-row plotse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they could be beller selection criteria for yield in single-row plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.