Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Response of direct seeded and transplanted pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) to nitrogen, phosphorus and biofertilizers in intercropping system

S.S. RATHORE; R.C. GAUTAM

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 1999 and 2000, at New Delhi, to study nutrient management in pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. emend. Stuntz.]. Hybrid Pusa 23 in sole and intercropping system with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Variety Pusa Komal under direct seeded and transplanted conditions. The crops were grown with varying levels of 1, P,O, along with biofertilizers (Azospirillum culture VAM). The treatments comprised 4 main plot treatments with 2 methods of planting pearlmillet with and without intercrop and 7 levels of fertilizers. The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding. Al though the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length, it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop which led to similar yield under both the conditions. The grain yield of pearlmillet with application of 40 kg N 30 kg P20 ha along with biofertilizers was at par with recommended dose of 60 kg N 45 kg P205/ha indicating saving of 20 kg N and 15 kg P,OJha through biofertilizers. There was no ef fect of cowpea intercropped with pearlmillet in both the years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted pearlmillet had lower grain weight per ear than direct seeded pearlmillet.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
transplantede0
Outcome
grain weightleare0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
direct seeded cropt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding. Al though the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length, it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted pearlmillet had shorter ears than direct seeded pearlmillet.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
transplantede0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
direct seeded cropt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding. Al though the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length, it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted pearlmillet had more ears per area than direct seeded pearlmillet.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
transplanted cropt0
Outcome
ears/m2e0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
direct seeded crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding. Al though the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length, it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted pearlmillet had greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded pearlmillet.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
transplanted cropt0
Outcome
1,000 grain weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
direct seeded crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding. Al though the transplanted crop had lower grain weightlear and shorter ear length, it had more ears/m2 and greater 1,000 grain weight than direct seeded crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was similar under transplanting and direct seeding.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
transplantingt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
direct seedingt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar yield under both the conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“The transplanting of pearlmillet was on a par with direct seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower fertilizer dose with biofertilizers gave grain yield at par with the recommended dose.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
40 kg N 30 kg P20 ha along with biofertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Value
20 kg N and 15 kg P,OJhae0
Comparator
recommended dose of 60 kg N 45 kg P205/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of pearlmillet with application of 40 kg N 30 kg P20 ha along with biofertilizers was at par with recommended dose of 60 kg N 45 kg P205/ha indicating saving of 20 kg N and 15 kg P,OJha through biofertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping had no effect on pearlmillet in either year.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
cowpea intercropped with pearlmillete0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
ef fecte0
Direction
no ef fecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no ef fect of cowpea intercropped with pearlmillet in both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1184 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.