Paper · 2015 · PubMed

[Effects of GA, and CPPU on grape fruit adjacent leaf photosynthesis and fruit quality].

Shou-peng Xin; Shuai Liu; Yang Yu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material, the effect of the combination of GA3 and CPPU on the light-response curves in the fruit adjacent leaves and fruit quality were investigated two weeks after blossoming. The results showed that non-rectangular hyperbolic model was more suitable for grape fruit adjacent leaf light response curve-fitting. Pn and g(s) of fruit adjacent leaves among all treatments increased with the increasing light intensity under the combination treat-ments of 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15, 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU, respectively, but Ci decreased. Fruit quality increased with the increasing CPPU concentration under the combination treatments of 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU, respectively. Grape fruit adjacent leaf photosynthesis under the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was higher than the other treatments. The fruit quality under the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was lower than the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment. It indicated that reasonable CPPU treatment concentration could improve fruit adjacent leaf photosynthetic ability and fruit quality. Too high concentration made the fruit quality lower instead. The 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was most appropriate in two weeks after blossoming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-rectangular hyperbolic model was more suitable than other models for fitting grape fruit adjacent leaf light-response curves.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Outcome
light response curve-fittinge1
Direction
more suitablee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that non-rectangular hyperbolic model was more suitable for grape fruit adjacent leaf light response curve-fitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–358 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pn and g(s) of grape fruit adjacent leaves increased with increasing light intensity under combined GA3 and CPPU treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Organ / stage
fruit adjacent leavese2
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15, 20 mg · L(-1) CPPUe2
Outcome
Pn and g(s)e2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
with the increasing light intensitye2

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pn and g(s) of fruit adjacent leaves among all treatments increased with the increasing light intensity under the combination treat-ments of 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15, 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU, respectively, but Ci decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–584 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ci of grape fruit adjacent leaves decreased under combined GA3 and CPPU treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Organ / stage
fruit adjacent leavese2
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15, 20 mg · L(-1) CPPUe2
Outcome
Cie2
Direction
decreasede2

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pn and g(s) of fruit adjacent leaves among all treatments increased with the increasing light intensity under the combination treat-ments of 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15, 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU, respectively, but Ci decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–584 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality of grape increased with increasing CPPU concentration under combined treatments with 25 mg · L(-1) GA3.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15 mg · L(-1) CPPUe3
Outcome
Fruit qualitye3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
with the increasing CPPU concentratione3

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit quality increased with the increasing CPPU concentration under the combination treatments of 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 and 5, 10, 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape fruit adjacent leaf photosynthesis under 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU was higher than under the other treatments.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Organ / stage
fruit adjacent leafe4
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPUe4
Outcome
fruit adjacent leaf photosynthesise4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
the other treatmentse4

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grape fruit adjacent leaf photosynthesis under the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was higher than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality of grape under 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU was lower than under 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPUe5
Outcome
fruit qualitye5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPUe5

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“The fruit quality under the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 20 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was lower than the 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1030 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A reasonable CPPU treatment concentration could improve grape fruit adjacent leaf photosynthetic ability and fruit quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Treatment
reasonable CPPU treatment concentratione6
Outcome
fruit adjacent leaf photosynthetic ability and fruit qualitye6

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“It indicated that reasonable CPPU treatment concentration could improve fruit adjacent leaf photosynthetic ability and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1164 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was most appropriate two weeks after blossoming in grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Shine Muscate0
Treatment
25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPUe7
Outcome
most appropriatee7
Qualifier
in two weeks after blossominge7

Verbatim

e0

“Taken the grape cultivar 'Shine Muscat' as the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e7

“The 25 mg · L(-1) GA3 + 15 mg · L(-1) CPPU treatment was most appropriate in two weeks after blossoming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1330 · show in text ↑

forchlorfenuron · quality: grain · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: grain · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.