Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Mycorrhizal inoculation can decreases negative effect of salinity on safflower varieties

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius .L) varieties seeds were used to study the influence of inoculation with mycorrhiza arbuscular fungi under salinity stress condition. Factorial experiment based on completely randomized design with 3 replications was used. Salinity treatment with 3 level (0.5, 6, and 12 dS/m) and mycorrhizal arbuscular inoculation with two species (Three level consist of on inoculation, and inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Glomus moseae) were applied on two cultivar of safflower (Goldasht and Padide) in this experiment. Some important growth traits such as stem height, leaf number, leaf area, leaf and stem dry weight and also root dry weight were measured. Content of Na and K and their Na/K ration were measured as well. The results showed that salinity has a negative effect on all growth parameters, but inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi decreased its negative effects. Content of Na and Na/K ratio was higher under salinity condition in compare to control, but K content were lower. Plants inoculated with mycorrhiza showed lower content of Na and Na/K ratio, but higher content of K. These results indicate positive effect of inoculation on safflower plants. Also, it seems that colonization with G. intraradices has a higher impact in safflower plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity had a negative effect on all measured growth parameters of safflower.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
all growth parameterse0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“salinity has a negative effect on all growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi decreased the negative effects of salinity on safflower growth parameters.

Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizal fungie1
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
negative effectse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi decreased its negative effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na content and the Na/K ratio were higher under salinity than in the control.

Treatment
salinitye2
Outcome
Content of Na and Na/K ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Content of Na and Na/K ratio was higher under salinity condition in compare to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K content was lower under salinity than in the control.

Treatment
salinitye3
Outcome
K contente3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“Content of Na and Na/K ratio was higher under salinity condition in compare to control, but K content were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza-inoculated plants had lower Na content and Na/K ratio.

Treatment
inoculated with mycorrhizae4
Interactor
mycorrhizae4symbiont
Outcome
content of Na and Na/K ratioe4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plants inoculated with mycorrhiza showed lower content of Na and Na/K ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza-inoculated plants had higher K content.

Treatment
inoculated with mycorrhizae5
Interactor
mycorrhizae5symbiont
Outcome
content of Ke5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants inoculated with mycorrhiza showed lower content of Na and Na/K ratio, but higher content of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that colonization with G. intraradices has a higher impact in safflower than the other inoculation.

Treatment
colonization with G. intraradicese6
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese6symbiont
Outcome
impacte6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“it seems that colonization with G. intraradices has a higher impact in safflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1293 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

30 papers: 0 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.