Paper · 2008 · HortScience

Effect of Fertigation on the ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ Table Olive Quality Before and After “Spanish-style” Green Processing

A. Morales-Sillero; R. Jiménez; J.E. Fernández; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Table olive quality was analyzed in adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments through five years (1999–2003). A randomized block design with four fertigation treatments was established: irrigated without fertilizer (control), and T200, T400, and T600 treatments, in which each tree was respectively fertigated with 200, 400, and 600 g N per irrigation season of a complex 4N–1P–3K fertilizer applied daily. Fruit yield and fruit physical characteristics and chemical composition were studied in 2002 and 2003. Fruit analysis realized in 2002 showed that the fruit pulp/stone ratio and water content increased with the amount of applied fertilizer. In 2003, a similar trend was found for fruit yield, weight, pulp/stone ratio, volume, longitudinal and transversal diameters, and fruit water and potassium concentrations. On the contrary, the concentration of reducing sugars; Ca, Na, and B; and the fruit texture decreased linearly with the fertilizer dose in 2003. No differences between treatments in fruit and stone shape, or stone volume or polyphenols concentration were found. On the other hand, the effect of the treatments on fruit browning damage was studied in 2003, as well as the fruit quality after “Spanish-style” green processing. In spite of the differences in fruit composition and texture, the fertigation treatments did not affect browning damage. After Spanish-style processing, differences between treatments in fruit weight and texture were again observed, but color, brown spots, and blistering incidence were not modified.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, fruit pulp/stone ratio and water content of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives increased with the amount of applied fertilizer.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
amount of applied fertilizere1
Outcome
fruit pulp/stone ratio and water contente1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in 2002e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit analysis realized in 2002 showed that the fruit pulp/stone ratio and water content increased with the amount of applied fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–698 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, fruit yield, fruit weight and pulp/stone ratio of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives showed a similar increasing trend with fertigation dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit yield, weight, pulp/stone ratioe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
similar trende2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2003, a similar trend was found for fruit yield, weight, pulp/stone ratio, volume, longitudinal and transversal diameters, and fruit water and potassium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, fruit volume and longitudinal and transversal diameters of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives showed a similar increasing trend with fertigation dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
volume, longitudinal and transversal diameterse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
similar trende2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2003, a similar trend was found for fruit yield, weight, pulp/stone ratio, volume, longitudinal and transversal diameters, and fruit water and potassium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, fruit water and potassium concentrations of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives showed a similar increasing trend with fertigation dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit water and potassium concentrationse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
similar trende2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2003, a similar trend was found for fruit yield, weight, pulp/stone ratio, volume, longitudinal and transversal diameters, and fruit water and potassium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, reducing sugar concentration of Manzanilla de Sevilla olive fruit decreased linearly with fertilizer dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Treatment
fertilizer dosee3
Outcome
concentration of reducing sugarse3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
linearlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the contrary, the concentration of reducing sugars; Ca, Na, and B; and the fruit texture decreased linearly with the fertilizer dose in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1015 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, fruit Ca, Na and B concentrations of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives decreased linearly with fertilizer dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Treatment
fertilizer dosee3
Outcome
Ca, Na, and Be3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
linearlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the contrary, the concentration of reducing sugars; Ca, Na, and B; and the fruit texture decreased linearly with the fertilizer dose in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1015 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, fruit texture of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives decreased linearly with fertilizer dose.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’e0
Organ / stage
fruite3
Treatment
fertilizer dosee3
Outcome
fruit texturee3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
linearlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the contrary, the concentration of reducing sugars; Ca, Na, and B; and the fruit texture decreased linearly with the fertilizer dose in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and stone shape and stone volume of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives did not differ between fertigation treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit and stone shape, or stone volumee4
Comparator
between treatmentse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“No differences between treatments in fruit and stone shape, or stone volume or polyphenols concentration were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenols concentration of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives did not differ between fertigation treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
polyphenols concentratione4
Comparator
between treatmentse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“No differences between treatments in fruit and stone shape, or stone volume or polyphenols concentration were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation treatments did not affect browning damage of Manzanilla de Sevilla olive fruit.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
fertigation treatmentse5
Outcome
browning damagee5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“In spite of the differences in fruit composition and texture, the fertigation treatments did not affect browning damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Spanish-style processing, fruit weight and texture differed between fertigation treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Organ / stage
fruite6
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit weight and texturee6
Comparator
between treatmentse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“After Spanish-style processing, differences between treatments in fruit weight and texture were again observed, but color, brown spots, and blistering incidence were not modified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Spanish-style processing, color, brown spots and blistering incidence of Manzanilla de Sevilla olives did not differ between fertigation treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
N–P–K fertigation treatmentse0
Outcome
color, brown spots, and blistering incidencee6
Comparator
between treatmentse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adult ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ olive trees subjected to different N–P–K fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“After Spanish-style processing, differences between treatments in fruit weight and texture were again observed, but color, brown spots, and blistering incidence were not modified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1596 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.