Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to identify suitable crops for Jatropha based intercropping system during winter season of 2005-06 and 2006-07 at Department of Forestry Farm, CCS HAU, Hisar. The production potential of greengram (Vigna radiata). cv-MH-96-1, clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). cv-HG-563, mothbean (Phaseolus aconitifolius). cv-RMO-40 and pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides). cv-HHB-67 were evaluated under 5m x 3m spacing of Jatropha planted in September 2003. Jatropha plantation had no significant effect on the growth and yield of test crops during the first year of experimentation except that mothbean, branching and yield was significantly reduced over control. However, the growth, yield and yield attributes of all the test crops were reduced significantly in Jatropha based intercropping system over control during the second year of experimentation. Two year old Jatropha produced negligible seed yield both during 2005-06 and 2006-07 due to frost injury in 2005-06 and excessive vegetative growth during 2006-07. Therefore, susceptibility of Jatropha to frost, requirement of irrigation for flowering and fruiting and poor seed yield has rendered it unsuitable for north India.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
First-year Jatropha intercropping did not significantly affect greengram growth and yield.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae1 - Treatment
- Jatropha plantatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Jatropha plantation had no significant effect on the growth and yield of test crops during the first year of experimentation except that mothbean, branching and yield was significantly reduced over control”
e1“greengram (Vigna radiata)”
Claim · model-written summary
First-year Jatropha intercropping did not significantly affect clusterbean growth and yield.
- Taxon
- clusterbean
Cyamopsis tetragonolobae1 - Treatment
- Jatropha plantatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Jatropha plantation had no significant effect on the growth and yield of test crops during the first year of experimentation except that mothbean, branching and yield was significantly reduced over control”
e1“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”
Claim · model-written summary
First-year Jatropha intercropping did not significantly affect pearlmillet growth and yield.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- Jatropha plantatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Jatropha plantation had no significant effect on the growth and yield of test crops during the first year of experimentation except that mothbean, branching and yield was significantly reduced over control”
e1“pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides)”
Claim · model-written summary
First-year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced mothbean branching and yield compared with control.
- Taxon
- mothbean
Vigna aconitifoliae1 - Treatment
- Jatropha plantatione2
- Outcome
- branching and yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mothbean, branching and yield was significantly reduced over control”
e1“mothbean (Phaseolus aconitifolius)”
e2“Jatropha plantation”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced growth, yield and yield attributes of greengram versus control.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- Jatropha based intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth, yield and yield attributes of all the test crops were reduced significantly in Jatropha based intercropping system over control during the second year of experimentation”
e1“greengram (Vigna radiata)”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced growth, yield and yield attributes of clusterbean versus control.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae1
- Treatment
- Jatropha based intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth, yield and yield attributes of all the test crops were reduced significantly in Jatropha based intercropping system over control during the second year of experimentation”
e1“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced growth, yield and yield attributes of mothbean versus control.
- Taxon
- mothbeanVigna aconitifoliae1
- Treatment
- Jatropha based intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth, yield and yield attributes of all the test crops were reduced significantly in Jatropha based intercropping system over control during the second year of experimentation”
e1“mothbean (Phaseolus aconitifolius)”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second year Jatropha intercropping significantly reduced growth, yield and yield attributes of pearlmillet versus control.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- Jatropha based intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth, yield and yield attributes of all the test crops were reduced significantly in Jatropha based intercropping system over control during the second year of experimentation”
e1“pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two-year-old Jatropha produced negligible seed yield in both seasons.
- Organ / stage
- Two year olde0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- negligiblee0
- Qualifier
- both during 2005-06 and 2006-07e0
JatrophaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two year old Jatropha produced negligible seed yield both during 2005-06 and 2006-07”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors deemed Jatropha unsuitable for north India because of frost susceptibility, irrigation needs and poor seed yield.
- Outcome
- unsuitable for north Indiae0
- Qualifier
- susceptibility of Jatropha to frost, requirement of irrigation for flowering and fruiting and poor seed yielde0
- Setting
- north Indiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“susceptibility of Jatropha to frost, requirement of irrigation for flowering and fruiting and poor seed yield has rendered it unsuitable for north India”
The same questions in other papers
Jatropha · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →intercropping · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.