Paper · 1992 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Nematode Populations and Peach Tree Survival, Growth, and Nutrition at an Old Orchard Site

Dean R. Evert; Paul F. Bertrand; `Benjamin G. Mullinix

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge cv . Paraguayan-22) growing under newly planted peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] trees severely stunted the trees. Neither supplemental fertilizer nor irrigating with two 3.8-liters·hour -1 emitters per tree eliminated tree stunting emitters were controlled by an automatic tensiometer set to maintain 3 kpa at a depth of 0.5 m under a tree in bahiagrass. Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters·ha -1 increased tree growth, but not tree survival. Fenamiphos, a nematicide, applied under the trees each spring and fall at a rate of 11 kg-ha - 1 had no positive effect on tree survival, tree growth, or nematode populations. Bahiagrass tended to suppress populations of Meloidogyne spp. under the trees., Meloidogyne spp. were the only nematodes present that had mean populations > 65 per 150 cm 3 of soil. Leaf concentrations of several elements differed between trees growing in bahiagrass sod and in. bare ground treated with herbicides. Leaf Ca was low for all treatments in spite of a soil pH near 6.5 and adequate soil Ca. The severe stunting of trees grown in bahiagrass, irrespective of the other treatments, demonstrated that bahiagrass should not be grown under newly planted trees. The low populations of parasitic nematodes in bahiagrass showed that bahiagrass has potential as a preplant biological control of nematodes harmful to peach trees. Chemical name used: ethyl 3-methy1-4-(methylthio) phenyl (1-methylethyl) phosphoramidate (fenamiphos).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bahiagrass growing under newly planted peach trees severely stunted the trees.

Treatment
Bahiagrasse0
Interactor
Bahiagrasse0other
Outcome
severely stunted the treese0
Direction
stuntede0
Comparator
bare ground treated with herbicidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge cv . Paraguayan-22) growing under newly planted peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] trees severely stunted the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e1

“bare ground treated with herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental fertilizer did not eliminate tree stunting under bahiagrass.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
supplemental fertilizere0
Outcome
tree stuntinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither supplemental fertilizer nor irrigating with two 3.8-liters·hour -1 emitters per tree eliminated tree stunting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating with two 3.8-liters/hour emitters per tree did not eliminate tree stunting under bahiagrass.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
irrigating with two 3.8-liters·hour -1 emitters per treee0
Outcome
tree stuntinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither supplemental fertilizer nor irrigating with two 3.8-liters·hour -1 emitters per tree eliminated tree stunting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters/ha increased peach tree growth.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters·ha -1e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters·ha -1 increased tree growth, but not tree survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide did not increase peach tree survival.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters·ha -1e0
Outcome
tree survivale0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 100 liters·ha -1 increased tree growth, but not tree survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos nematicide had no positive effect on tree survival or tree growth.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Fenamiphos, a nematicide, applied under the trees each spring and fall at a rate of 11 kg-ha - 1e0
Outcome
tree survival, tree growthe0
Direction
no positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fenamiphos, a nematicide, applied under the trees each spring and fall at a rate of 11 kg-ha - 1 had no positive effect on tree survival, tree growth, or nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos nematicide had no positive effect on nematode populations.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Fenamiphos, a nematicide, applied under the trees each spring and fall at a rate of 11 kg-ha - 1e0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
no positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fenamiphos, a nematicide, applied under the trees each spring and fall at a rate of 11 kg-ha - 1 had no positive effect on tree survival, tree growth, or nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bahiagrass tended to suppress populations of Meloidogyne spp. under the peach trees.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Bahiagrasse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
populations of Meloidogyne spp.e0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bahiagrass tended to suppress populations of Meloidogyne spp. under the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne spp. were the only nematodes present with mean populations above 65 per 150 cm3 of soil.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
only nematodes present that had mean populations > 65 per 150 cm 3 of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meloidogyne spp. were the only nematodes present that had mean populations > 65 per 150 cm 3 of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf concentrations of several elements differed between trees growing in bahiagrass sod and in bare ground treated with herbicides.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
bahiagrass sode0
Outcome
Leaf concentrations of several elementse0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
bare ground treated with herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf concentrations of several elements differed between trees growing in bahiagrass sod and in. bare ground treated with herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Ca was low for all treatments despite a soil pH near 6.5 and adequate soil Ca.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Outcome
Leaf Ca was lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Ca was low for all treatments in spite of a soil pH near 6.5 and adequate soil Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Bahiagrass should not be grown under newly planted trees.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Outcome
should not be grown under newly planted treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bahiagrass should not be grown under newly planted trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude bahiagrass has potential as a preplant biological control of nematodes harmful to peach trees.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae0
Outcome
potential as a preplant biological control of nematodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bahiagrass has potential as a preplant biological control of nematodes harmful to peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1411 · show in text ↑

fenamiphos · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

solarization · survival · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · crop injury · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

solarization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.