Paper · 2005 · HortScience

Suppression of Phytophthora Root Rot in Red Raspberries with Cultural Practices and Soil Amendments

Kevin Maloney; Marvin Pritts; Wayne Wilcox; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Various soil amendments and cultural practices were examined in both a phytophthora-infested ( Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi ) (+PFR) and uninfested field (–PFR) planted to `Heritage' red raspberries. Although plants in the +PFR field did not exhibit typical disease symptoms due to unseasonably dry weather, their growth was less than those in the –PFR field. After 2 years, plants in the +PFR site had the highest yields in plots treated with phosphorous acid or amended with gypsum, whereas compost-amended plots had the lowest yields in both +PFR and –PFR sites. A second field study confirmed the positive effect of gypsum on growth and yield of raspberries in an infested site. In a third study, `Titan' raspberries grown under greenhouse conditions in pots containing unamended soil from the infested site, then flooded, exhibited severe disease symptoms; however, pasteurization of the soil, treatment with phosphorous acid and metalaxyl fungicide, or gypsum amendment mostly prevented symptoms from developing. These three studies suggest that a preplant soil amendment containing certain readily available forms of calcium, such as found in gypsum, can help suppress phytophthora root rot and increase survival, growth and yield of raspberries in sites where the pathogen is present.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raspberries in infested field had less growth than those in uninfested field.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
–PFR fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their growth was less than those in the –PFR field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorous acid produced the highest yields in infested plots.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
phosphorous acide0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
+PFR sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in the +PFR site had the highest yields in plots treated with phosphorous acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum produced the highest yields in infested plots.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
gypsume0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
+PFR sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in the +PFR site had the highest yields in plots treated with phosphorous acid or amended with gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plots had the lowest yields in both infested and uninfested sites.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
compost-amendede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
both +PFR and –PFR sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost-amended plots had the lowest yields in both +PFR and –PFR sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second field study confirmed a positive gypsum effect on raspberry growth and yield.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
gypsume0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Setting
infested sitee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A second field study confirmed the positive effect of gypsum on growth and yield of raspberries in an infested site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested soil and flooding produced severe disease symptoms in Titan raspberries.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Material
Titane0
Outcome
severe disease symptomse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Titan' raspberries grown under greenhouse conditions in pots containing unamended soil from the infested site, then flooded, exhibited severe disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pasteurization mostly prevented disease symptoms.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
pasteurization of the soile0
Outcome
symptoms from developinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pasteurization of the soil, treatment with phosphorous acid and metalaxyl fungicide, or gypsum amendment mostly prevented symptoms from developing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorous acid mostly prevented disease symptoms.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
phosphorous acide0
Outcome
symptoms from developinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with phosphorous acid and metalaxyl fungicide, or gypsum amendment mostly prevented symptoms from developing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl mostly prevented disease symptoms.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
metalaxyl fungicidee0
Outcome
symptoms from developinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with phosphorous acid and metalaxyl fungicide, or gypsum amendment mostly prevented symptoms from developing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum mostly prevented disease symptoms.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
gypsum amendmente0
Outcome
symptoms from developinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gypsum amendment mostly prevented symptoms from developing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑

metalaxyl · disease · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

lime · yield · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · disease · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · disease · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.