Abstract
In order to investigate the effect of tillage kinds and wheat residues and their interactions on qualitative and quantitative yield sugar beet, an experiment in a split plot design in a randomized complete block design in the farming year at the 2012-2013 was conducted. The main factor includes tillage in two levels of conventional and conservation and sub factor residues of wheat in four levels includes zero (control), 1, 3 and 5 tons per hectare. According to the variance analysis results of tillage at one percent probable on the leaf dry weight and at the five percent probable on the leaf fresh weight, root dry weight and potassium has a significant effect, but on the root fresh weight, sodium, harmful nitrogen, sugar content, alkalinity, sugar molasses has not meaningful effect. Also the wheat residues and interaction effect of tillage with wheat residues had no significant effect on the measured parameters. The obtained results of mean comparison showed that the conventional tillage causes more leaf fresh
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage significantly affected sugar beet leaf dry weight at one percent probability.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- tillagee0
- Outcome
- leaf dry weighte0
- Qualifier
- one percent probablee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“tillage at one percent probable on the leaf dry weight”
e1“has a significant effect”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage significantly affected sugar beet leaf fresh weight, root dry weight and potassium at five percent probability.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- tillagee1
- Outcome
- leaf fresh weight, root dry weight and potassiume0
- Qualifier
- five percent probablee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“at the five percent probable on the leaf fresh weight, root dry weight and potassium has a significant effect”
e1“tillage in two levels of conventional and conservation”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage had no significant effect on root fresh weight, sodium and harmful nitrogen in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- tillagee1
- Outcome
- root fresh weight, sodium, harmful nitrogene0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“but on the root fresh weight, sodium, harmful nitrogen, sugar content, alkalinity, sugar molasses has not meaningful effect”
e1“tillage in two levels of conventional and conservation”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage had no significant effect on sugar content, alkalinity and sugar molasses in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- tillagee1
- Outcome
- sugar content, alkalinity, sugar molassese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“but on the root fresh weight, sodium, harmful nitrogen, sugar content, alkalinity, sugar molasses has not meaningful effect”
e1“tillage in two levels of conventional and conservation”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat residues had no significant effect on measured sugar beet parameters.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- wheat residuese0
- Outcome
- measured parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the wheat residues and interaction effect of tillage with wheat residues had no significant effect on the measured parameters”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The tillage-by-wheat-residue interaction had no significant effect on measured sugar beet parameters.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- tillage with wheat residuese0
- Outcome
- measured parameterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“interaction effect of tillage with wheat residues had no significant effect on the measured parameters”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage produced greater sugar beet leaf fresh weight.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- leaf freshe0
- Direction
- moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the conventional tillage causes more leaf fresh”
t0“Sugar Beet”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →tillage · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.