Paper · 1996 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Root Restriction and Potassium and Calcium Solution Concentrations Affect Dry-matter Production, Cation Uptake, and Blossom-end Rot in Greenhouse Tomato

A. Bar-Tal; E. Pressman

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root restriction has been reported to reduce fruit yield, the incidence of blossom end rot (BER) and K concentration in tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. `F121') plant organs. The objectives of the present work were to study the effect of root restriction, and combination of K and Ca solution concentrations, on greenhouse tomato fruit yield, quality and cation uptake. Root restriction reduced total yield but improved fruit quality by increasing the dry matter concentration and reducing the incidence of BER. Increasing the K concentration from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1 reduced the marketable yield, due to increased incidence of BER. Root restriction decreased K concentration and K/Ca ratio in tomato plant organs, but had no effect on K uptake rate per unit root fresh weight. Increasing K concentration from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1 increased the K concentration in plant organs and K uptake rate, but reduced that of Ca. In contrast, increasing Ca concentration in the solution had no effect on K concentration in plant organs and K uptake rate. The incidence of BER correlated well with K/Ca concentration ratio in the leaves, whereas a poor correlation was obtained with K/Ca concentration ratio in ripe fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction reduced total tomato yield.

Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction reduced total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction increased fruit dry matter concentration.

Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
dry matter concentratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction reduced total yield but improved fruit quality by increasing the dry matter concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction reduced blossom end rot incidence.

Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
incidence of BERe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction reduced total yield but improved fruit quality by increasing the dry matter concentration and reducing the incidence of BER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution K from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1 reduced marketable yield.

Treatment
K concentration from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the K concentration from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1 reduced the marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution K from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1 increased blossom end rot incidence.

Treatment
K concentration from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1e0
Outcome
incidence of BERe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the K concentration from 5.0 to 10 mmol·L -1 reduced the marketable yield, due to increased incidence of BER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction decreased K concentration and K/Ca ratio in tomato organs.

Organ / stage
plant organse0
Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
K concentration and K/Ca ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction decreased K concentration and K/Ca ratio in tomato plant organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root restriction had no effect on K uptake rate per unit root fresh weight.

Treatment
Root restrictione0
Outcome
K uptake rate per unit root fresh weighte0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root restriction decreased K concentration and K/Ca ratio in tomato plant organs, but had no effect on K uptake rate per unit root fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1 increased organ K concentration and K uptake rate.

Treatment
K concentration from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1e0
Outcome
K concentration in plant organs and K uptake ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K concentration from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1 increased the K concentration in plant organs and K uptake rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1 reduced Ca uptake.

Treatment
K concentration from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1e0
Outcome
that of Cae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K concentration from 2.5 to 10 mmol·L -1 increased the K concentration in plant organs and K uptake rate, but reduced that of Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution Ca did not affect organ K concentration or K uptake rate.

Treatment
increasing Ca concentration in the solutione0
Outcome
K concentration in plant organs and K uptake ratee0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing Ca concentration in the solution had no effect on K concentration in plant organs and K uptake rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1045 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom end rot incidence correlated well with leaf K/Ca ratio.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Compound
K/Cae0
Outcome
incidence of BERe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of BER correlated well with K/Ca concentration ratio in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom end rot incidence had a poor correlation with ripe-fruit K/Ca ratio.

Organ / stage
ripe fruite0
Compound
K/Cae0
Outcome
poor correlatione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a poor correlation was obtained with K/Ca concentration ratio in ripe fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1212 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

53 papers: 43 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.