Paper · 1996 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Watertable and Fertilizer Management on Susceptibility of Tomato Fruit to Chilling Injury

Georges T. Dodds; Leif Trenholm; Chandra A. Madramootoo

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a 2-year study (1993-1994), `New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters were subjected to four watertable depth (WTD) treatments (0.3, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 m from the soil surface) factorially combined with 5 potassium/calcium fertilization combinations. Mature-green fruit from four replicates of each treatment were stored at 5C for 21 days, and fruit color was monitored with a tristimulus colorimeter. Fruit were subsequently allowed to ripen at 20C for 10 days, at which time chilling injury was assessed on the basis of delayed ripening and area of lesions. Potassium and calcium applied in the field had no effect on chilling tolerance of the fruit. In the drier year (1993), shallower WTD treatments generally yielded fruit that changed color less during chilling and were more chilling-sensitive based on delayed ripening. In the wetter year, differences in color change and chilling tolerance between WTD, if any, were small. Over both years, lesion area varied with WTD, but not in a consistent manner. Based on these results, we suggest that differences in water availability should be considered when studying tomato fruit chilling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and calcium applied in the field had no effect on chilling tolerance of tomato fruit.

Treatment
Potassium and calcium applied in the fielde1
Outcome
chilling tolerancee1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium and calcium applied in the field had no effect on chilling tolerance of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the drier year, shallower water tables made tomato fruit change color less during chilling.

Treatment
shallower WTDe2
Outcome
changed colore2
Direction
lesse2
Setting
drier yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the drier year (1993), shallower WTD treatments generally yielded fruit that changed color less during chilling and were more chilling-sensitive based on delayed ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the drier year, shallower water tables made tomato fruit more chilling-sensitive based on delayed ripening.

Treatment
shallower WTDe2
Outcome
delayed ripeninge2
Direction
more chilling-sensitivee2
Setting
drier yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the drier year (1993), shallower WTD treatments generally yielded fruit that changed color less during chilling and were more chilling-sensitive based on delayed ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the wetter year, differences in color change and chilling tolerance between water table depths were small, if any.

Treatment
WTDe3
Outcome
differences in color change and chilling tolerancee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
if anye3
Setting
wetter yeare3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the wetter year, differences in color change and chilling tolerance between WTD, if any, were small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesion area of tomato fruit varied with water table depth, but not in a consistent manner.

Treatment
WTDe4
Outcome
lesion areae4
Qualifier
not in a consistent mannere4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e4

“Over both years, lesion area varied with WTD, but not in a consistent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1054 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in water availability should be considered when studying tomato fruit chilling.

Outcome
differences in water availability should be considerede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`New Yorker' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown in field lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“we suggest that differences in water availability should be considered when studying tomato fruit chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1186 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · tolerance: abiotic · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · tolerance: abiotic · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.