Paper · 2003 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

The effect of soil amendment and irrigation schedule on growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) and seasonal irrigation applied

A.A. Ramalan

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the Irrigation Research Farm of the Institute for Agricultural Research Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria (11 o 11'N, 7 o 23'E, 686 m above sea level) to assess the influence of applying soil amendment and irrigation schedule on onion growth, yield and irrigation applied. The amendment, Alcosorb 400, at rates 0, 300, 600, 900 kg ha -1 and irrigation schedule at fixed frequency of 7 days, and soil moisture tension of 30 and 60 cb were combined in a factorial experiment laid out in a randomized complete block design in three replications. Results showed significant influence of the amendment on leaf length at 16 weeks after transplanting and leaf yield. At the rate of 300 kg ha -1 , leaf length and leaf yield were highest at 35.60 cm and 6.22 t/ha respectively. While bulb yield and seasonal irrigation applied were unaffected by the application of the amendment, they were both influenced by irrigation schedule. The highest yield of 17.72 t/ha was obtained with the 7 day fixed interval of irrigation. At 30 and 60 cb, significant decline resulted in yields of 12.25 and 10.63 t/ha respectively. The maximum seasonal irrigation depth was 482 mm of water. The interactions of Alcosorb 400 with irrigation schedule were found not significant (p=5 %).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcosorb significantly influenced leaf length at 16 weeks.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
amendmente0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed significant influence of the amendment on leaf length at 16 weeks after transplanting and leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcosorb significantly influenced leaf yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
amendmente0
Outcome
leaf yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant influence of the amendment on leaf length at 16 weeks after transplanting and leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 kg ha -1 Alcosorb, leaf length was highest at 35.60 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
300 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
35.60 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the rate of 300 kg ha -1 , leaf length and leaf yield were highest at 35.60 cm and 6.22 t/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 kg ha -1 Alcosorb, leaf yield was highest at 6.22 t/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
300 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
leaf yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.22 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the rate of 300 kg ha -1 , leaf length and leaf yield were highest at 35.60 cm and 6.22 t/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment did not affect bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application of the amendmente0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb yield and seasonal irrigation applied were unaffected by the application of the amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment did not affect seasonal irrigation applied.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application of the amendmente0
Outcome
seasonal irrigation appliede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb yield and seasonal irrigation applied were unaffected by the application of the amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation schedule influenced bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
irrigation schedulee0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were both influenced by irrigation schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day irrigation yielded the highest bulb yield of 17.72 t/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
7 day fixed interval of irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.72 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of 17.72 t/ha was obtained with the 7 day fixed interval of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 cb, yield declined to 12.25 t/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
30e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
declinee0
Value
12.25e0
Comparator
7 day fixed interval of irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 30 and 60 cb, significant decline resulted in yields of 12.25 and 10.63 t/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest yield of 17.72 t/ha was obtained with the 7 day fixed interval of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 cb, yield declined to 10.63 t/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
60 cbe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
declinee0
Value
10.63 t/hae0
Comparator
7 day fixed interval of irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 30 and 60 cb, significant decline resulted in yields of 12.25 and 10.63 t/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest yield of 17.72 t/ha was obtained with the 7 day fixed interval of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum seasonal irrigation depth was 482 mm of water.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
seasonal irrigation depthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
482 mm of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seasonal irrigation depth was 482 mm of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcosorb and irrigation schedule interaction was not significant.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Alcosorb 400e0
Outcome
interactions of Alcosorb 400 with irrigation schedulee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions of Alcosorb 400 with irrigation schedule were found not significant (p=5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.