Abstract
In order to investigate the effect of tillage systems and plant density in two plant pattern, on kernel yield and its component on corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704), an experimental design , randomized complete block in a strip factorial was used, treatments arrangement with four replications in north of Iran in 2010. Main plot was subjected to tillage systems in three levels: 1. Rotary system (RS). 2. Disk system (DS) - 3. Plow and Disck system (PDS). Other factors were plant density in three levels (60000, 70000 and 80000 plant/ha) and plant pattern were conventional row (linear) and new two rows (zigzag).The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference,while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference. With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively. Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage systems produced no significant difference in corn grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not show any significant differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage systems produced no significant difference in corn silage yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- silage yielde0
- Direction
- did not show any significant differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated that the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by tillage systems did not show any significant difference”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant density significantly affected corn grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- plant densitye0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant density significantly affected corn silage yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- plant densitye0
- Outcome
- silage yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while the grain yield and silage yield, which were affected by plant density showed significant difference.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha increased grain yield from 9.793 to 10.92 t/ha.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- density from 60000 to 80000 plants/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.793 to 10.92e0
- Comparator
- 60000e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha increased silage yield from 62.68 to 70.85 t/ha.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- density from 60000 to 80000 plants/hae0
- Outcome
- silage yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 62.68 to70.85 t/hae0
- Comparator
- 60000e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With the increase of density from 60000 to 80000 plants/ha, grain yield and silage yield increased, an amount of from 9.793 to 10.92 and 62.68 to70.85 t/ha respectively.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant pattern did not affect corn grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- plant patterne0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant pattern did not affect corn silage yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- plant patterne0
- Outcome
- silage yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield and silage yield were not affected by plant pattern.”
t0“CORN (ZEA MAYS L)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.