Paper · 2014

Effect of Different Osmopriming Sources and Levels on Germination and Root Length of Sorghum

Sajjad Khan; Muahammad Ilyas; Bakth Daraz Khan; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted to evaluate the response of sorghum germination to various sources and levels of osmopriming. The experiment was laid down in completely randomize design with four replications. In this research eight priming sources i.e. NaCl, CaCl , KCl, KNO , NH Cl, Na SO , 2 3 4 2 4 PEG and Manitol along with seed soaking in water and control were tested on sorghum seed germinated in laboratory to test germination % and the effect of osmopriming on germination of sorghum seed in incubator at room temperature after 24 hour priming. The data was recorded on germination % in incubator and at room temperature and root length (cm). Statistical analysis of the data revealed that germination % and root length were significantly affected by osmopriming sources and levels. Mean values showed that maximum germination (94 %) for PEG 8000, root length (7.02 cm) for NaCl. Among chemicals CaCl showed higher germination. Similarly NaCl and PEG 2 800 were also better than other chemical sources. KNO showed very poor 3 performance among all chemicals. The lower levels of most chemicals performed better than higher levels. It was concluded that soaking seed with osmopriming agents in low concentrations enhances germination and rapid seed emergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmopriming sources and levels significantly affected germination and root length.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
osmopriming sources and levelse0
Outcome
germination % and root lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination % and root length were significantly affected by osmopriming sources and levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG 8000 gave the maximum germination of 94 %.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
PEG 8000e0
Outcome
maximum germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
94 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum germination (94 %) for PEG 8000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl gave a root length of 7.02 cm.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Value
7.02 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (7.02 cm) for NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl had higher germination among chemicals.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
CaCle0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
chemicalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among chemicals CaCl showed higher germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl and PEG 2 800 performed better than other chemical sources.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
NaCl and PEG 2 800e0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other chemical sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NaCl and PEG 2 800 were also better than other chemical sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO showed very poor performance among chemicals.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
very poor 3 performancee0
Direction
very poore0
Comparator
all chemicalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO showed very poor 3 performance among all chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower chemical levels performed better than higher levels.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
lower levels of most chemicalse0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
higher levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower levels of most chemicals performed better than higher levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentration osmopriming was recommended to enhance germination and emergence.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
osmopriming agents in low concentrationse0
Outcome
enhances germination and rapid seed emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking seed with osmopriming agents in low concentrations enhances germination and rapid seed emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · SorghumResults differ

73 papers: 14 positive, 59 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.