Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Optimizing plant spacing for modern rice varieties

A. M. M. Monjurul; A. B. Puteh; Mohd Razi Ismail; et al.

8
claims
32
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E) during the period of December 2011 to May 2012 to evaluate the effect of spacing on assimilate availability, yield attributes and yield of modern rice varieties. Four modern rice cultivars BINAdhan5, BINAdhan6, Iratom and BRRIdhan29 were sown with three spacing viz., 20 cm × 20 cm, 20 cm × 15 cm and 20 cm × 10 cm. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four replicates. Wider spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm had shown superior performance in respect of all morpho-physiological and yield components, which resulted in the highest grain yield (8.53 t ha -1 ). In contrast, closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm showed inferior performance in respect of above studied parameters and produced the lowest grain yield (6.47 t ha -1 ). Among the cultivars, BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6 performed the best regarding yield attributes and produced the highest grain yields (7.53 and 7.72 t ha -1 , respectively). The spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm may be recommended for cultivation of high yielding modern rice instead of recommended spacing of 20 cm × 15 cm after few more trials in farmers’ field. © 2013 Friends Science Publishers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm gave the highest grain yield (8.53 t ha -1).

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Treatment
20 cm × 20 cme1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
8.53 t ha -1e2
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wider spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in the highest grain yield (8.53 t ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 598–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm was superior for all morpho-physiological and yield components.

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Treatment
20 cm × 20 cme1
Outcome
morpho-physiological and yield componentse3
Direction
superior performancee3
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wider spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–499 · show in text ↑
e3

“had shown superior performance in respect of all morpho-physiological and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm gave the lowest grain yield (6.47 t ha -1).

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Treatment
closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cme4
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
loweste5
Value
6.47 t ha -1e5
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–695 · show in text ↑
e5

“produced the lowest grain yield (6.47 t ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 767–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm was inferior for the studied morpho-physiological and yield parameters.

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Treatment
closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cme4
Outcome
above studied parameterse6
Direction
inferior performancee6
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“closer spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–695 · show in text ↑
e6

“showed inferior performance in respect of above studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–762 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRdhan29 gave the highest grain yield (7.53 t/ha) among the cultivars.

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Material
BRRdhan29e1
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
7.53e2
Comparator
the cultivarse3
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6 performed the best regarding yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the highest grain yields (7.53 and 7.72 t ha -1, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 911–983 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–835 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BINAdhan6 gave the highest grain yield (7.72 t/ha) among the cultivars.

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Material
BINAdhan6e1
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
7.72e2
Comparator
the cultivarse3
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6 performed the best regarding yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced the highest grain yields (7.53 and 7.72 t ha -1, respectively)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 911–983 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–835 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6 performed best for yield attributes.

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Material
BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6e1
Outcome
yield attributese1
Direction
performed the beste1
Setting
sub-tropical conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was performed under sub-tropical condition (24.75 N and 90.50 E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“BRRdhan29 and BINAdhan6 performed the best regarding yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–906 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm may be recommended for cultivation of high yielding modern rice instead of 20 cm × 15 cm (author recommendation).

Taxon
modern rice varietiest0
Treatment
The spacing of 20 cm × 20 cme1
Outcome
cultivation of high yielding modern ricee1
Comparator
recommended spacing of 20 cm × 15 cme2

Verbatim

t0

“modern rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm may be recommended for cultivation of high yielding modern rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“instead of recommended spacing of 20 cm × 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1125 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.