Paper · 2012

Yield Performance of Five Cassava Genotypes under Different Fertilizer Rates

D. F. K. Allotey; E. A. Akuffo

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Introduction of improved cassava varieties may require proper fertilizer management for increased and sustained root production. A factorial experiment involving five cassava genotypes and four levels of fertilizer with three replications was established at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Crop Research Institute, Fumesua near Ejisu, Ghana (6 0 43’00’N and 1 0 28’0”W). The five cassava genotypes (Debor, Afisafi, Tuaka, Afebankye and Sisipi 290) were fertilized with NPK at the following rates:F0: 0 N – 0 P2O5 – 0 K2O kg/ha (Control), F1: 60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (Low), F2: 120N – 60 P2O5 – 180 K2O kg/ha (Medium) and F3: 180N – 90 P2O5 – 270 K2O kg/ha (High). The two trials were conducted from 9 th September 2007 to 17 th September 2008 and 22 nd May 2009 to 22 nd July 2010. Fertilizer significantly (P < 0.05) increased tuber yields. Fresh tuber yields of all the genotypes except Afisafi and Sisipe 290, generally, increased with increasing rates of fertilizer application. Whereas fresh root yields of Debor increased with increasing rates of the fertilizer up to the maximum rate (F3), yield reductions of Tuaka, Afisafi and Sisipe also occurred at this rate. All the genotypes gave similar root yield except Sisipe 290 which produced significantly lower root yield. Interaction between genotypes and fertilizer was significant. Fresh root yields of Debor, Tuaka and Afebankye were significantly (P < 5%) higher over the control at the lowest rate (F1). The economic rate of fertilization for higher fresh root yield of all other genotypes except Debor is F1. Sisipe 290 had the highest starch content at the F1 fertilizer treatment. For higher fresh root yields, 60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1), 120N – 60 P2O5 – 180 K2O kg/ha (F2) and 180N – 90 P2O5 – 270 K2O kg/ha (F3) are recommended for Afebankye and Tuaka, Afisafi and Debor respectively. With regards to starch content, 60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1 ) rate is recommended for Debor, Afisafi and Sisipe 290, while F2: 120N – 60 P2O5 – 180 K2O kg/ha for Tuaka.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer significantly increased cassava tuber yields.

Treatment
Fertilizere1
Outcome
tuber yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
P < 0.05e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer significantly (P < 0.05) increased tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh tuber yields of most cassava genotypes increased with increasing fertilizer rates.

Material
all the genotypes except Afisafi and Sisipe 290e2
Treatment
increasing rates of fertilizer applicatione2
Outcome
Fresh tuber yieldse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fresh tuber yields of all the genotypes except Afisafi and Sisipe 290, generally, increased with increasing rates of fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh root yield of Debor increased with fertilizer rates up to the maximum rate F3.

Material
Debore3
Treatment
up to the maximum rate (F3)e3
Outcome
fresh root yieldse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“Whereas fresh root yields of Debor increased with increasing rates of the fertilizer up to the maximum rate (F3), yield reductions of Tuaka, Afisafi and Sisipe also occurred at this rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of Tuaka, Afisafi and Sisipe 290 was reduced at the maximum fertilizer rate F3.

Material
Tuaka, Afisafi and Sisipee3
Treatment
up to the maximum rate (F3)e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
reductionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“Whereas fresh root yields of Debor increased with increasing rates of the fertilizer up to the maximum rate (F3), yield reductions of Tuaka, Afisafi and Sisipe also occurred at this rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sisipe 290 gave significantly lower root yield than the other genotypes.

Material
Sisipe 290e4
Outcome
root yielde4
Direction
lowere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the genotypes gave similar root yield except Sisipe 290 which produced significantly lower root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cassava genotypes gave similar root yield, apart from Sisipe 290.

Material
All the genotypese4
Outcome
root yielde4
Direction
similare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the genotypes gave similar root yield except Sisipe 290 which produced significantly lower root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between genotypes and fertilizer was significant.

Outcome
Interaction between genotypes and fertilizere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e5

“Interaction between genotypes and fertilizer was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh root yields of Debor, Tuaka and Afebankye were significantly higher than the control at the lowest rate F1.

Material
Debor, Tuaka and Afebankyee6
Treatment
lowest rate (F1)e6
Outcome
Fresh root yieldse6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
P < 5%e6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fresh root yields of Debor, Tuaka and Afebankye were significantly (P < 5%) higher over the control at the lowest rate (F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1494 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rate F1 is the economic rate for higher fresh root yield of all genotypes except Debor.

Material
all other genotypes except Debore7
Outcome
economic rate of fertilization for higher fresh root yielde7
Value
F1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e7

“The economic rate of fertilization for higher fresh root yield of all other genotypes except Debor is F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sisipe 290 had the highest starch content at the F1 fertilizer treatment.

Material
Sisipe 290e0
Treatment
F1 fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sisipe 290 had the highest starch content at the F1 fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1674 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rates of 60N, 120N and 180N per ha are recommended for higher fresh root yields of the five genotypes.

Material
Afebankye and Tuaka, Afisafi and Debore1
Outcome
higher fresh root yieldse1
Value
60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“For higher fresh root yields, 60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1), 120N – 60 P2O5 – 180 K2O kg/ha (F2) and 180N – 90 P2O5 – 270 K2O kg/ha (F3) are recommended for Afebankye and Tuaka, Afisafi and Debor respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1888 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rate F1 is recommended for starch content of Debor, Afisafi and Sisipe 290.

Material
Debor, Afisafi and Sisipe 290e2
Outcome
starch contente2
Value
60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1 )e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“With regards to starch content, 60N – 30 P2O5 – 90 K2O kg/ha (F1 ) rate is recommended for Debor, Afisafi and Sisipe 290”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2010 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.