Paper · 2015

Effect of Ultraviolet Light on Plant Development and Fruit Production Year 3: The Next Generation S2015

Diane L. Polyakov

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objectives/Goals To determine if reducing the exposure to UV light on pea plants affects the plants' development, fruit production, rate of germination and fruit production over two generations. Methods/Materials Build a habitat for the pea plants using wood and clear plastic. One area of habitat is coated with UV blocking film. Three environments exist for plants to grow: Control, Receiving UV Light, and UV Light Blocked. Five pots grow in each environment, one plant per pot. Measure plants and then after pea pods grow, remove pods and measure weight, number of seeds and length of pods from first generation. Extract seeds from pods. Germinate seeds produced from all plants. Plant germinated seeds so that each environment has five pots (and five plants) from each of the three environments, for a total of 45 second generation plants. Grow second generation plants and then repeat steps for first generation, comparing fruit production over two generations. Results The average weight for of the seeds produced from the UV Light Blocked environment was 3.78 grams, produced from the Receiving UV Light environment was 3.18 grams, and produced from the Control environment was 2.87 grams. The average length of the pea pods produced from the UV Light Blocked environment was 6.15 cm, produced from the Receiving UV Light environment was 5.49 cm, and produced from the Control environment was 5.7 cm. The average number of seeds per pea pod produced by from the UV Light Blocked environment was 4.6, from the Receiving UV Light environment was 3.8, and for the Control environment was 3.4. The percentage of seeds that germinated from seeds produced in the UV Light Blocked environment was 87.92%, from seeds produced in the Receiving UV Light environment was 79.20%, and from seeds produced in the Control environment was 83.20%. Conclusions/Discussion Reducing the amount of UV light the pea plants received resulted in those plants being more productive when compared to pea plants exposed to full sunlight. The seeds from the pea plants grown in the UV Light Blocked environment germinated at a faster and higher rate. Over two generations, the seeds from the UV Light Blocked environment were not as productive, producing less and smaller fruit and showing signs of disease at an earlier stage of plants' development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV blocked pea plants produced seeds with average weight 3.78 grams versus 3.18 grams under receiving UV light and 2.87 grams in control.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
average weight for of the seedse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
3.78 gramse0
Qualifier
2.87 gramse0
Comparator
Receiving UV Light environmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The average weight for of the seeds produced from the UV Light Blocked environment was 3.78 grams, produced from the Receiving UV Light environment was 3.18 grams, and produced from the Control environment was 2.87 grams.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV blocked pea plants produced pods averaging 6.15 cm, versus 5.49 cm with UV light and 5.7 cm in control.

Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
average length of the pea podse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
6.15 cme0
Qualifier
5.7 cme0
Comparator
Receiving UV Light environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average length of the pea pods produced from the UV Light Blocked environment was 6.15 cm, produced from the Receiving UV Light environment was 5.49 cm, and produced from the Control environment was 5.7 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV blocked pea pods averaged 4.6 seeds versus 3.8 under receiving UV and 3.4 in control.

Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
average number of seeds per pea pode0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4.6e0
Qualifier
3.4e0
Comparator
Receiving UV Light environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average number of seeds per pea pod produced by from the UV Light Blocked environment was 4.6, from the Receiving UV Light environment was 3.8, and for the Control environment was 3.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from UV blocked peas germinated at 87.92%, versus 79.20% with UV and 83.20% in control.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
percentage of seeds that germinatede0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
87.92%e0
Qualifier
83.20%e0
Comparator
Receiving UV Light environmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of seeds that germinated from seeds produced in the UV Light Blocked environment was 87.92%, from seeds produced in the Receiving UV Light environment was 79.20%, and from seeds produced in the Control environment was 83.20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV blocked pea seeds germinated faster.

Taxon
pea plantsLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
germinatede0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds from the pea plants grown in the UV Light Blocked environment germinated at a faster and higher rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2019–2130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across two generations, UV blocked pea seeds produced less and smaller fruit.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
less and smallere0
Qualifier
Over two generationse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Over two generations, the seeds from the UV Light Blocked environment were not as productive, producing less and smaller fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across two generations, UV blocked pea progeny showed disease earlier.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
UV Light Blocked environmente0
Outcome
signs of diseasee0
Direction
earliere0
Qualifier
Over two generationse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Over two generations, the seeds from the UV Light Blocked environment were not as productive, producing less and smaller fruit and showing signs of disease at an earlier stage of plants' development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

uv · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

uv · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

climate site · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

climate site · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 33 positive, 26 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.