Paper · 1999 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Potassium Requirements for Maximum Yield and Fruit Quality of Processing Tomato

T.K. Hartz; G. Miyao; R.J. Mullen; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A survey of 140 processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California was conducted in 1996-97 to examine the relationship between K nutrition and fruit quality for processing. Quality parameters evaluated were soluble solids (SS), pH, color of a blended juice sample, and the percent of fruit affected by the color disorders yellow shoulder (YS) or internal white tissue (IWT). Juice color and pH were not correlated with soil K availability or plant K status. SS was correlated with both soil exchangeable K and midseason leaf K concentration ( r = 0.25 and 0.28, p < 0.01) but the regression relationships suggested that the impact of soil or plant K status on fruit SS was minor. YS and IWT incidence, which varied among fields from 0% to 68% of fruit affected, was negatively correlated with K status of both soil and plant. Soil exchangeable K/√Mg ratio was the measure of soil K availability most closely correlated with percent total color disorders (YS + IWT, r = -0.45, p < 0.01). In field trials conducted to document the relationship between soil K availability and the fruit color disorders, soil application of either K or gypsum (CaSO 4 , to increase K/√Mg ratio) reduced YS and total color disorders. Multiple foliar K applications were effective in reducing fruit color disorders at only one of two sites. In no field trial did K application improve yield, SS, or juice color.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Juice color and pH were uncorrelated with soil K availability or plant K status.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
Ke1
Outcome
Juice color and pHe1
Direction
not correlatede1
Setting
central Californiae0

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Juice color and pH were not correlated with soil K availability or plant K status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–486 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids correlated with soil exchangeable K, although the inferred impact was minor.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
soil exchangeable Ke1
Outcome
SSe1
Value
r = 0.25e1
Qualifier
minore1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“SS was correlated with both soil exchangeable K and midseason leaf K concentration ( r = 0.25 and 0.28, p < 0.01) but the regression relationships suggested that the impact of soil or plant K status on fruit SS was minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–708 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids correlated with midseason leaf K concentration, but the inferred impact was minor.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
midseason leaf K concentratione1
Outcome
SSe1
Value
0.28e1
Qualifier
minore1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“SS was correlated with both soil exchangeable K and midseason leaf K concentration ( r = 0.25 and 0.28, p < 0.01) but the regression relationships suggested that the impact of soil or plant K status on fruit SS was minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow shoulder and internal white tissue incidence varied from 0% to 68% among fields.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Outcome
YS and IWT incidencee1
Value
0% to 68%e1

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“YS and IWT incidence, which varied among fields from 0% to 68% of fruit affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow shoulder and internal white tissue incidence were negatively correlated with soil and plant potassium status.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
Ke1
Outcome
YS and IWT incidencee1
Direction
negatively correlatede1

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“YS and IWT incidence, which varied among fields from 0% to 68% of fruit affected, was negatively correlated with K status of both soil and plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–854 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil exchangeable K/√Mg ratio was the soil K measure most closely correlated with total color disorders.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
Soil exchangeable K/√Mg ratioe1
Outcome
percent total color disorderse1
Direction
most closely correlatede1
Value
r = -0.45e1

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil exchangeable K/√Mg ratio was the measure of soil K availability most closely correlated with percent total color disorders (YS + IWT, r = -0.45, p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K application reduced yellow shoulder and total color disorders.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
soil application of either Ke1
Outcome
YS and total color disorderse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of either K or gypsum (CaSO 4 , to increase K/√Mg ratio) reduced YS and total color disorders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum soil application reduced yellow shoulder and total color disorders.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
gypsume1
Outcome
YS and total color disorderse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of either K or gypsum (CaSO 4 , to increase K/√Mg ratio) reduced YS and total color disorders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple foliar K applications reduced fruit color disorders at only one of two sites.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
Multiple foliar K applicationse1
Outcome
fruit color disorderse1
Direction
reducinge1
Qualifier
only one of two sitese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Multiple foliar K applications were effective in reducing fruit color disorders at only one of two sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application did not improve yield, soluble solids, or juice color in any field trial.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
K applicatione1
Outcome
yield, SS, or juice colore1
Direction
no field trial did K application improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fields in central California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“In no field trial did K application improve yield, SS, or juice color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1418 · show in text ↑

lime · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

potassium · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 51 positive, 10 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.