Paper · 2012

Qualitative and morphologic response of forage sorghum as affected by irrigation interval and planting pattern

Seyyed Gholamreza Moosavi; Mohamad Javad Seghatoleslami; Elham Ansarinia

14
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of irrigation intervals and planting pattern on the morphological and qualitative traits of forage sorghum was conducted an experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station of Azad University, Birjand Branch, Iran in year 2006. The experimental design was split plot in form RCBD with three replications and with 4 levels of irrigation interval (5, 10, 15 and 20 days) as main plots and 2 levels of planting pattern (one row above the furrow and two rows within the furrow) as sub plots. The results showed that the effect of planting pattern and interaction irrigation interval × planting pattern on these traits was not significant but water deficit stress decreased height, diameter, number leaf of main stem and number of tiller in plant, significantly so that with increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively. Also, irrigation interval had a significant effect on the percentage of crude protein, crude fiber, ash and protein yield of the first and second cut. The comparison of mentioned traits average showed that with the increase of irrigation interval, the percentage of crude protein, crude fiber and ash percent decreased in both cuttings significantly. In the first cut, 5 days irrigation interval with the production of 0.90 ton/ha had the highest yield of protein and 20 days irrigation interval with 0.411 ton/ha had the lowest yield of protein. Also in the second cutting the increase of the irrigation interval from 5 to 20 days caused crude protein yield decreased from 1.2 to 0.2 ton/ha. The results showed that the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage but with respect to water limitation and intense need to forage in the region, in order to scrounge in the amount of consumption water in the level unit and increase of under cultivation lands, we can use 10 days irrigation interval for the planting of forage sorghum in Birdjand region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern and its interaction with irrigation interval had no significant effect on the morphological and qualitative traits of forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
planting patterne1
Outcome
these traitse1
Direction
not significante1

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of planting pattern and interaction irrigation interval × planting pattern on these traits was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of forage sorghum was reduced by 26.6% in the first cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
reducede2
Value
26.6e2
Qualifier
in the first cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number per main stem of forage sorghum was reduced by 23.2% in the first cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
leaf number per main steme2
Direction
reducede2
Value
23.2e2
Qualifier
in the first cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter of forage sorghum was reduced by 28.5% in the first cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
stem diametere2
Direction
reducede2
Value
28.5e2
Qualifier
in the first cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of forage sorghum was reduced by 55.8% in the second cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
declinede2
Value
55.8e2
Qualifier
in the second cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number per main stem of forage sorghum was reduced by 40.2% in the second cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
leaf number per main steme2
Direction
declinede2
Value
40.2e2
Qualifier
in the second cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter of forage sorghum was reduced by 40.1% in the second cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
stem diametere2
Direction
declinede2
Value
40.1e2
Qualifier
in the second cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller number per plant of forage sorghum was reduced by 17.65% in the second cut as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale2
Outcome
tiller number per plante2
Direction
declinede2
Value
17.65e2
Qualifier
in the second cute2
Comparator
5 days irrigation intervale5

Verbatim

e2

“increasing irrigation interval from5 to 20 days, plant height, leaf number per main stem and stem diameter in the first cut reduced 26.6, 23.2 and 28.5 percent, respectively and in the second cut, these traits and tiller number per plant declined 55.8, 40.2, 40.1 and 17.65 percent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein, crude fiber and ash percentages of forage sorghum decreased significantly in both cuttings as irrigation interval increased.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation intervale4
Outcome
crude protein, crude fiber and ash percente4
Direction
decreasede4

Verbatim

e4

“with the increase of irrigation interval, the percentage of crude protein, crude fiber and ash percent decreased in both cuttings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first cut, the 5 day irrigation interval gave the highest protein yield of forage sorghum, 0.90 ton/ha.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
5 days irrigation intervale6
Outcome
yield of proteine6
Direction
higheste6
Value
0.90 ton/hae6
Qualifier
In the first cute6

Verbatim

e6

“In the first cut, 5 days irrigation interval with the production of 0.90 ton/ha had the highest yield of protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first cut, the 20 day irrigation interval gave the lowest protein yield of forage sorghum, 0.411 ton/ha.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
20 days irrigation intervale7
Outcome
yield of proteine7
Direction
loweste7
Value
0.411 ton/hae7
Qualifier
In the first cute6

Verbatim

e6

“In the first cut, 5 days irrigation interval with the production of 0.90 ton/ha had the highest yield of protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1568 · show in text ↑
e7

“20 days irrigation interval with 0.411 ton/ha had the lowest yield of protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein yield of forage sorghum decreased from 1.2 to 0.2 ton/ha in the second cutting as irrigation interval increased from 5 to 20 days.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
the increase of the irrigation interval from 5 to 20 dayse1
Outcome
crude protein yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
1.2 to 0.2 ton/hae1
Qualifier
in the second cuttinge1

Verbatim

e1

“in the second cutting the increase of the irrigation interval from 5 to 20 days caused crude protein yield decreased from 1.2 to 0.2 ton/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 day irrigation interval gave forage sorghum the highest vegetative growth, yield and forage quality.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
5 days irrigation intervale5
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and more qualitye5
Direction
higheste5

Verbatim

e5

“the 5 days irrigation interval allocated to itself the highest vegetative growth, yield and more quality of forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 10 day irrigation interval for planting forage sorghum in the Birjand region.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Outcome
10 days irrigation interval for the planting of forage sorghume1
Setting
Birdjand regione1

Verbatim

e1

“we can use 10 days irrigation interval for the planting of forage sorghum in Birdjand region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

51 papers: 31 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.