Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at the Desert Experimental Station of the Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ. in Wadi El-Natroon, during 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 seasons to study the response of sugar beet yield and some of its attributes in three multigerm seed cultivars, viz. Heba, Ninagri and Halawa under drip irrigation in a split plot design to foliar application with zinc (Zn) + Manganese (Mn) + Iron (Fe) + Boron (B). The mixture of micronutrients was applied at three different concentrations, viz. 50 Zn + 50 Mn + 50 Fe + 500 B (C ), 100 Zn + 100 Mn + 100 Fe + 1000 B (C ) and 150 Zn + 150 Mn + 150 Fe + 1500 B (C ) in ppm/L, as well as, 12 3 the control treatment of distilled water (C ). The results revealed that increasing micronutrients mixture from 0 C level up to C level significantly increased root weight by 21.54% and 23.81%, root yield by 28.00% and 03 24.40% and sugar yield by 76.50% and 60.61% in the first and second seasons, respectively. Quality traits, in terms of total soluble solids (TSS), sucrose%, purity% and extractable sucrose% were significantly increased by increasing levels of micronutrients in both seasons. The highest values of such traits resulted from C level. 3 The sugar beet cultivar Halawa recorded the highest and significant values of mean root weight (0.93 and 0.98 kg), root yield (23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.), extractable sucrose% (14.04 and 13.59%) and sugar yield (3.34 and 3.35 ton/fed.) in the first and second seasons, respectively. The interaction between micronutrients and cultivars was significant for mean root weight, root yield, purity%, extractable sucrose% and sugar yield in both seasons. Spraying cultivar Halawa with C and/or C level was recommended for high root and sugar yields. 23
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing micronutrients raised root weight by 21.54% and 23.81% across seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- increasing micronutrients mixturee0
- Outcome
- root weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 21.54% and 23.81%e0
- Comparator
- 0 C levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing micronutrients mixture from 0 C level up to C level significantly increased root weight by 21.54% and 23.81%”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing micronutrients raised root yield by 28.00% and 24.40% across seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.00% and 03 24.40%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing micronutrients mixture from 0 C level up to C level significantly increased root weight by 21.54% and 23.81%, root yield by 28.00% and 03 24.40%”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing micronutrients raised sugar yield by 76.50% and 60.61% across seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 76.50% and 60.61%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing micronutrients mixture from 0 C level up to C level significantly increased root weight by 21.54% and 23.81%, root yield by 28.00% and 03 24.40% and sugar yield by 76.50% and 60.61%”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing micronutrients significantly improved soluble solids, sucrose, purity and extractable sucrose.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- increasing levels of micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- total soluble solids (TSS), sucrose%, purity% and extractable sucrose%e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total soluble solids (TSS), sucrose%, purity% and extractable sucrose% were significantly increased by increasing levels of micronutrients in both seasons”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Halawa had the highest mean root weight: 0.93 and 0.98 kg.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Material
- Halawae0
- Outcome
- mean root weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.93 and 0.98 kge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The sugar beet cultivar Halawa recorded the highest and significant values of mean root weight (0.93 and 0.98 kg)”
Claim · model-written summary
Halawa had highest root yield: 23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Halawae0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Value
- 23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Halawa recorded the highest and significant values of mean root weight (0.93 and 0.98 kg), root yield (23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Halawa had extractable sucrose of 14.04 and 13.59%.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Halawae0
- Outcome
- extractable sucrose%e0
- Value
- 14.04 and 13.59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Halawa recorded the highest and significant values of mean root weight (0.93 and 0.98 kg), root yield (23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.), extractable sucrose% (14.04 and 13.59%)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Halawa had sugar yield of 3.34 and 3.35 ton/fed.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Halawae0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Value
- 3.34 and 3.35 ton/fed.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Halawa recorded the highest and significant values of mean root weight (0.93 and 0.98 kg), root yield (23.52 and 24.34 ton/fed.), extractable sucrose% (14.04 and 13.59%) and sugar yield (3.34 and 3.35 ton/fed.)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient and cultivar interaction was significant for root weight, root yield, purity, extractable sucrose and sugar yield.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- mean root weight, root yield, purity%, extractable sucrose% and sugar yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between micronutrients and cultivars was significant for mean root weight, root yield, purity%, extractable sucrose% and sugar yield in both seasons”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommended spraying Halawa with the stated C levels for high root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Halawae0
- Outcome
- Spraying cultivar Halawa with C and/or C levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying cultivar Halawa with C and/or C level was recommended for high root and sugar yields”
t0“Sugar Beet”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →micronutrient · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →micronutrient · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.