Paper · 2011 · The Open Agriculture Journal

Improving Almond Productivity under Deficit Irrigation in Semiarid Zones

I.F. García-Tejero; V.H. Durán-Zuazo; L.M. Vélez; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable water use is one of the greatest challenges of irrigated agricultural systems. This study presents the results related to the agronomic and physiological response to the deficit irrigation of almond trees ( Prunus dulcis DA Webb Mill cv. Guara) under semiarid Mediterranean conditions in the Guadalquivir river basin (SW Spain). Two deficitirrigation strategies were tested: i) regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), which was irrigated at 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETC) throughout the irrigation period, except during the kernel-filling stage, when these trees where irrigated at 30% ETC, and ii) low-frequency deficit irrigation (LFDI), in which trees were subjected to different irrigationrestriction periods, defined in terms of stem water potential at midday (Ψ Stem ). As control, a fully irrigated treatment (C-100) was used, which received irrigation covering the 100% of ETC. The stem water potential (Ψ Stem ), the stomatal conductance (gS), the photosynthesis rate (Pn) and canopy temperature (TC) were monitored, revealing significant differences mainly in LFDI in comparison with C-100. Also, highly significant relationships were found among plant physiological parameters, showing that the water status is strongly related to the crop water availability. On other hand, in terms of nut yield, there was a notable improvement under LFDI compared with RDI, with increases of 16% in relation to C-100, and with water savings of close to 170 mm. Thus, these findings demonstrate that the LFDI is a sustainable strategy to improve almond productivity as well as water-use efficiency under limited water resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-frequency deficit irrigation significantly changed stem water potential, stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and canopy temperature versus full irrigation.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise0
Material
Guarae0
Treatment
LFDIe1
Outcome
stem water potential (Ψ Stem ), the stomatal conductance (gS), the photosynthesis rate (Pn) and canopy temperature (TC)e1
Comparator
C-100e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almond trees ( Prunus dulcis DA Webb Mill cv. Guara)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–256 · show in text ↑
e1

“The stem water potential (Ψ Stem ), the stomatal conductance (gS), the photosynthesis rate (Pn) and canopy temperature (TC) were monitored, revealing significant differences mainly in LFDI in comparison with C-100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Almond physiological parameters had highly significant relationships, linking water status to crop water availability.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise0
Outcome
water statuse1
Comparator
crop water availabilitye1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“highly significant relationships were found among plant physiological parameters, showing that the water status is strongly related to the crop water availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-frequency deficit irrigation improved almond nut yield versus regulated deficit irrigation.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
LFDIe1
Outcome
nut yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
RDIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“in terms of nut yield, there was a notable improvement under LFDI compared with RDI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-frequency deficit irrigation increased almond nut yield by 16% versus full irrigation.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
LFDIe1
Outcome
nut yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
16%e1
Comparator
C-100e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“in terms of nut yield, there was a notable improvement under LFDI compared with RDI, with increases of 16% in relation to C-100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-frequency deficit irrigation saved close to 170 mm of water.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
LFDIe2
Outcome
water savingse1
Direction
savingse1
Value
close to 170 mme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“with water savings of close to 170 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1471 · show in text ↑
e2

“LFDI compared with RDI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1384 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude low-frequency deficit irrigation improves almond productivity and water-use efficiency under limited water.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Outcome
LFDI is a sustainable strategy to improve almond productivity as well as water-use efficiency under limited water resourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the LFDI is a sustainable strategy to improve almond productivity as well as water-use efficiency under limited water resources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1638 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 10 positive, 15 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.