Abstract
Abstract: N-fixing and P-solubilizing bacteria playing a significant role as a plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in diverse crops. In order to evaluate efficiency of PGPR plus nitrogen and phosphorous chemical fertilizers on yield of wheat (cv. N-80-19) a field experiment was arranged in split-split plots based on randomized complete block design with three replications. The main and sub plot consisting of phosphorous 1 1 (0, 25 and 50 kg ha) and nitrogen (0, 50 and 100 kg ha), respectively and sub sub-plot were considered PGPR at four levels (control, inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (PFB), phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and dual inoculation with PFB and PSB). Results showed that application of biofertilizers could increase grain yield and harvest index as much as 46.6 and 48.8 % compared to control, respectively. Integrated treatments showed better performance in terms of grain number per spike, tiller number and shoot length by 35.57, 35.1 and 31.9% compared to separate treatments, respectively. Furthermore, biofertilizers significantly reduced P and N fertilizer application without any reduction in wheat yield related parameters. Generally, results of this study revealed that using of biofertilizers especially dual inoculation had effective and significant role in terms of all studied yield characteristics except spike length in given wheat cultivar.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers increased wheat grain yield by 46.6% versus control.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 46.6e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of biofertilizers could increase grain yield and harvest index as much as 46.6 and 48.8 % compared to control, respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers increased wheat harvest index by 48.8 % versus control.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 48.8 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of biofertilizers could increase grain yield and harvest index as much as 46.6 and 48.8 % compared to control, respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated treatments improved wheat grain number per spike by 35.57 relative to separate treatments.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Integrated treatmentse0
- Outcome
- grain number per spikee0
- Direction
- better performancee0
- Value
- 35.57e0
- Comparator
- separate treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Integrated treatments showed better performance in terms of grain number per spike, tiller number and shoot length by 35.57, 35.1 and 31.9% compared to separate treatments, respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated treatments improved wheat tiller number by 35.1 relative to separate treatments.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Integrated treatmentse0
- Outcome
- tiller numbere0
- Direction
- better performancee0
- Value
- 35.1e0
- Comparator
- separate treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Integrated treatments showed better performance in terms of grain number per spike, tiller number and shoot length by 35.57, 35.1 and 31.9% compared to separate treatments, respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated treatments improved wheat shoot length by 31.9% relative to separate treatments.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Integrated treatmentse0
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe0
- Direction
- better performancee0
- Value
- 31.9%e0
- Comparator
- separate treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Integrated treatments showed better performance in terms of grain number per spike, tiller number and shoot length by 35.57, 35.1 and 31.9% compared to separate treatments, respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers significantly reduced the need for phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizer without lowering wheat yield traits.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- P and N fertilizer applicatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- without any reduction in wheat yield related parameterse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“biofertilizers significantly reduced P and N fertilizer application without any reduction in wheat yield related parameters.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation significantly improved studied wheat yield characteristics except spike length.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- dual inoculatione0
- Outcome
- all studied yield characteristicse0
- Qualifier
- except spike lengthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“biofertilizers especially dual inoculation had effective and significant role in terms of all studied yield characteristics except spike length in given wheat cultivar.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.