Paper · 2007 · HortScience

Improving the Efficacy of Cytokinin Applications for Stimulation of Lateral Branch Development in Young Sweet Cherry Trees in the Orchard

Don C. Elfving; Dwayne B. Visser

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving lateral branch development in young sweet cherry trees without reliance on pruning is a desirable component of tree training programs, especially for high-density systems. Applications of two proprietary formulations of 6-benzyladenine and gibberellins A 4 and A 7 (Promalin, Valent Biosciences, Walnut Creek, Calif.; and Perlan, Fine Americas, Walnut Creek, Calif.) to individual buds or intact bark of unpruned sweet cherry central leader shoots at green-tip had little effect on lateral shoot growth from buds or on distribution of new shoot growth along the treated leader shoots. Scoring, nicking, or notching cuts alone also had inconsistent effects on shoot development and distribution. In some trials, bud removal (or disbudding, removing every fourth bud on 1-year-old shoots) produced limited improvement of lateral shoot development and vertical distribution. Combining nicking, notching, scoring, or bark scraping with the application of cytokinin–gibberellic acid solution to the cut area greatly improved both number of shoots developed and the numbers originating from the lower portions of treated leader shoots. Removing the physical barrier to bioregulator product contact with active tissues was a primary factor in improving treatment efficacy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promalin and Perlan bud or bark applications had little effect on shoot growth or distribution.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
individual buds or intact barke0
Treatment
Applications of two proprietary formulations of 6-benzyladenine and gibberellins A 4 and A 7e0
Outcome
lateral shoot growth from buds or on distribution of new shoot growthe0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of two proprietary formulations of 6-benzyladenine and gibberellins A 4 and A 7 (Promalin, Valent Biosciences, Walnut Creek, Calif.; and Perlan, Fine Americas, Walnut Creek, Calif.) to individual buds or intact bark of unpruned sweet cherry central leader shoots at green-tip had little effect on lateral shoot growth from buds or on distribution of new shoot growth along the treated leader shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scoring, nicking or notching alone had inconsistent shoot effects.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Scoring, nicking, or notching cuts alonee0
Outcome
shoot development and distributione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Scoring, nicking, or notching cuts alone also had inconsistent effects on shoot development and distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disbudding produced limited lateral shoot and distribution improvement in some trials.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
bud removal (or disbudding, removing every fourth bud on 1-year-old shoots)e0
Outcome
lateral shoot development and vertical distributione0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
In some trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In some trials, bud removal (or disbudding, removing every fourth bud on 1-year-old shoots) produced limited improvement of lateral shoot development and vertical distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuts or bark scraping plus cytokinin–gibberellic acid greatly increased shoot number and lower-shoot origin.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Combining nicking, notching, scoring, or bark scraping with the application of cytokinin–gibberellic acid solution to the cut areae0
Outcome
number of shoots developed and the numbers originating from the lower portions of treated leader shootse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining nicking, notching, scoring, or bark scraping with the application of cytokinin–gibberellic acid solution to the cut area greatly improved both number of shoots developed and the numbers originating from the lower portions of treated leader shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–122 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the physical barrier to tissue contact primarily improved regulator efficacy.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
treatment efficacye0
Qualifier
Removing the physical barrier to bioregulator product contact with active tissuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Removing the physical barrier to bioregulator product contact with active tissues was a primary factor in improving treatment efficacy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 104–122 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.