Paper · 2014 · Electronic journal of biology

Growth, Yield, Yield Components and Water-Use Efficiency in Irrigated Cantaloupes under Full and Deficit Irrigation

Ali Ahmadi-Mirabad; Mahmoud Lotfi; Mahmoud Reza Roozban

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water scarcity is a limiting factor for crop production in arid and semi-arid regions. To evaluating effects of deficit irrigation (DI) on growth, yield, yield components and water-use efficiency (WUE) in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions, a field experiment based randomized completely block design (RCBD) with three replications was conducted. In this experiment, three irrigation treatments consisted of 60 (I60), 80 (I80), and 100% ETc (I100, Control) were applied during the growing season. Based on the results, the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100, while highest chlorophyll (Chl) a, total Chl content and Chl stability index obtained at I80 treatment. Moderate water stress (I80) did not reduce cantaloupe yield but led to increase WUE and total soluble solids (TSS). Under I60 treatment, the yield was reduced by 35.3% mainly due to decrease of fruit weight, while value of WUE (0.89 t ha-1 cm-1) in this treatment was 45.9% greater than I100. Maximum value of TSS (9.3%) was achieved at I60. Based on the total fruit yield, the preferable level of DI for cantaloupe production is I80, and in region that goal is preserving water resources, I60 treatment, recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation (I100) gave the highest total crop yield, 30.3 t ha-1.

Treatment
I100e1
Outcome
total crop yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
30.3 t ha-1e1
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation (I100) gave the highest mean number of fruits per plant, 4.9.

Treatment
I100e1
Outcome
mean number of fruits per plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.9e1
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation (I100) gave the highest mean fruit weight, 1.508 g.

Treatment
I100e1
Outcome
mean fruit weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.508 ge1
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation (I100) gave the longest plant main stem, 194.6 cm.

Treatment
I100e1
Outcome
plant main stem lengthe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
194.6 cme1
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation (I100) gave the largest total leaf area, 24.375 cm2.

Treatment
I100e1
Outcome
total leaf areae1
Direction
higheste1
Value
24.375 cm2e1
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total crop yield (30.3 t ha-1), mean number of fruits per plant (4.9), mean fruit weight (1.508 g), plant main stem length (194.6 cm) and total leaf area (24.375 cm2) were obtained in I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I80 treatment gave the highest chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll content and chlorophyll stability index.

Treatment
I80e2
Outcome
chlorophyll (Chl) a, total Chl content and Chl stability indexe2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest chlorophyll (Chl) a, total Chl content and Chl stability index obtained at I80 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress (I80) did not reduce cantaloupe yield.

Treatment
Moderate water stress (I80)e3
Outcome
cantaloupe yielde3
Direction
did not reducee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Moderate water stress (I80) did not reduce cantaloupe yield but led to increase WUE and total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress (I80) increased WUE and total soluble solids.

Treatment
Moderate water stress (I80)e3
Outcome
WUE and total soluble solids (TSS)e3
Direction
led to increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Moderate water stress (I80) did not reduce cantaloupe yield but led to increase WUE and total soluble solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under I60 treatment, total yield was reduced by 35.3%, mainly due to lower fruit weight.

Treatment
I60e4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
reducede4
Value
35.3%e4
Qualifier
mainly due to decrease of fruit weighte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under I60 treatment, the yield was reduced by 35.3% mainly due to decrease of fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under I60 treatment, WUE was 45.9% greater than under I100.

Treatment
I60e4
Outcome
value of WUEe5
Direction
greatere5
Value
45.9%e5
Qualifier
0.89 t ha-1 cm-1e5
Comparator
I100e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under I60 treatment, the yield was reduced by 35.3% mainly due to decrease of fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1057 · show in text ↑
e5

“value of WUE (0.89 t ha-1 cm-1) in this treatment was 45.9% greater than I100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I60 treatment gave the maximum total soluble solids, 9.3%.

Treatment
I60e6
Outcome
TSSe6
Direction
Maximume6
Value
9.3%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e6

“Maximum value of TSS (9.3%) was achieved at I60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1191 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend I80 as the preferable deficit irrigation level for cantaloupe production, based on total fruit yield.

Treatment
I80e7
Outcome
preferable level of DI for cantaloupe productione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Based on the total fruit yield, the preferable level of DI for cantaloupe production is I80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1284 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend I60 where the goal is preserving water resources.

Treatment
I60 treatmente2
Outcome
preserving water resourcese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cantaloupe crop (Cucumis melo L.) under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“in region that goal is preserving water resources, I60 treatment, recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1367 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.