Abstract
In this study, Maraton F 1 and Assos F 1 cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings were grafted on P.360 (Cucurbita maxima x Cucurbita moschata) and Arican-97 (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) rootstocks using hole-insertion grafting (HIG) and cleft grafting (CG) methods. Grafting success rate was investigated 20 days later. There was a significant difference between the two rootstocks regarding grafting success rate (99.2% for P.360 and 80.8% for Arican-97), which did not vary depending on grafting methods (88.3% and 91.7% for HIG and CG, respectively) or cucumber cultivars (90.8% and 89.2% for Maraton F 1 and Assos F 1 , respectively). Grafted and non-grafted (control) cucumbers were then cultivated in soil contaminated with the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita under greenhouse conditions to determine greenhouse performance by analyzing earliness and total yield as well as plant-growth parameters. In general, the yield and growth of non-grafted plants were significantly reduced, compared with grafted plants. Earliness and total yield were increased in grafted cucumber cultivars (by 53-120% and 87-209%, respectively, in cv. Marathon F 1 and by 20100% and 54-154%, respectively, in cv. Assos F 1 ), compared with control plants. Likewise, plant-growth and development parameters were improved in grafted plants, compared with controls. These data suggest that grafted plants prevent the reduction in cucumber yield caused by continuous cropping due to soil-borne pathogens.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting success on the P.360 rootstock (99.2%) was significantly higher than on Arican-97.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0 - Material
- P.360e0
- Treatment
- P.360e0
- Outcome
- grafting success ratee0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 99.2%e0
- Comparator
- Arican-97e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cucumber seedlings”
e0“There was a significant difference between the two rootstocks regarding grafting success rate (99.2% for P.360 and 80.8% for Arican-97)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting success on the Arican-97 rootstock (80.8%) was significantly lower than on P.360.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- Arican-97e0
- Treatment
- Arican-97e0
- Outcome
- grafting success ratee0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 80.8%e0
- Comparator
- P.360e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cucumber seedlings”
e0“There was a significant difference between the two rootstocks regarding grafting success rate (99.2% for P.360 and 80.8% for Arican-97)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting success did not vary with grafting method (88.3% for hole-insertion and 91.7% for cleft grafting).
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- HIGe0
- Outcome
- grafting methodse0
- Direction
- did not varye0
- Value
- 88.3% and 91.7%e0
- Comparator
- CGe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cucumber seedlings”
e0“which did not vary depending on grafting methods (88.3% and 91.7% for HIG and CG, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting success did not vary between the cucumber cultivars Maraton F1 (90.8%) and Assos F1 (89.2%).
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Maraton F 1e0
- Outcome
- cucumber cultivarse0
- Value
- 90.8% and 89.2%e0
- Comparator
- Assos F 1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cucumber seedlings”
e0“cucumber cultivars (90.8% and 89.2% for Maraton F 1 and Assos F 1 , respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
In nematode-infested soil under greenhouse conditions, yield and growth of non-grafted cucumbers were significantly reduced compared with grafted plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- non-grafted plantse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae2pathogen - Outcome
- yield and growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- grafted plantse0
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the yield and growth of non-grafted plants were significantly reduced, compared with grafted plants”
e1“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”
e2“soil contaminated with the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita under greenhouse conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting increased earliness of cv. Marathon F 1 by 53-120% compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Marathon F 1e0
- Treatment
- grafted cucumber cultivarse0
- Outcome
- Earlinesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 53-120%e0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Earliness and total yield were increased in grafted cucumber cultivars (by 53-120% and 87-209%, respectively, in cv. Marathon F 1 and by 20100% and 54-154%, respectively, in cv. Assos F 1 ), compared with control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting increased total yield of cv. Marathon F 1 by 87-209% compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Marathon F 1e0
- Treatment
- grafted cucumber cultivarse0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 87-209%e0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Earliness and total yield were increased in grafted cucumber cultivars (by 53-120% and 87-209%, respectively, in cv. Marathon F 1 and by 20100% and 54-154%, respectively, in cv. Assos F 1 ), compared with control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting increased earliness of cv. Assos F 1 by 20100% compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Assos F 1e0
- Treatment
- grafted cucumber cultivarse0
- Outcome
- Earlinesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20100%e0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Earliness and total yield were increased in grafted cucumber cultivars (by 53-120% and 87-209%, respectively, in cv. Marathon F 1 and by 20100% and 54-154%, respectively, in cv. Assos F 1 ), compared with control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting increased total yield of cv. Assos F 1 by 54-154% compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Assos F 1e0
- Treatment
- grafted cucumber cultivarse0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 54-154%e0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Earliness and total yield were increased in grafted cucumber cultivars (by 53-120% and 87-209%, respectively, in cv. Marathon F 1 and by 20100% and 54-154%, respectively, in cv. Assos F 1 ), compared with control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant growth and development parameters were improved in grafted plants compared with controls.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse1
- Treatment
- grafted plantse0
- Outcome
- plant-growth and development parameterse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant-growth and development parameters were improved in grafted plants, compared with controls”
e1“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted plants prevent the reduction in cucumber yield caused by continuous cropping due to soil-borne pathogens.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted plantse0
- Interactor
- soil-borne pathogense0pathogen
- Outcome
- reduction in cucumber yielde0
- Direction
- prevente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grafted plants prevent the reduction in cucumber yield caused by continuous cropping due to soil-borne pathogens”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →grafting · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.