Paper · 2012

SALINITY, GERMINATION PROMOTING CHEMICALS, TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT EFFECTS ON SEED GERMINATION OF ANETHUM GRAVEOLENS L.

Mehmet Cüneyt Ünver; Fahrettin Tilki

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Unver, M. C. and F. Tilki, 2012. Salinity, germination promoting chemicals, temperature and light effects on seed germination of Anethum graveolens l. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 18: 1005-1011 The aim of this study was to ascertain the effects of different osmotic solutions on water uptake of Anethum graveolens l. (dill) and to understand the germination behavior of the seeds in response to salinity, germination promoting chemicals, temperature, and light. For water uptake from salt solution five salinity concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 molar NaCl) and for sucrose solution five concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 molar) were used. Water uptake decreases when the osmotic pressure of the solution increases. A maximum water uptake was observed at 0.1 molar naCl solutions and 0.1 molar sugar solutions in each imbibitions duration and the least at 3 molar. Temperature and time affected water uptake, and the water uptake was maximum at 20 oC after 96 h, and the least at 30 oC. The promotive effect of germination promoting chemicals (10 and 100 ppm iAA and GA3) was significant. An application of IAA and GA3 decreased the salinity stress up to 1.5% level. GA3 proves more effective than IAA at 0.5 and 1.0% NaCl. Seed germination of dill was influenced by temperature, and 25 oC was found to be the optimal temperature for germination, and it was also seen that light did not significantly affect seed germination

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake decreased as solution osmotic pressure increased.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
osmotic pressure of the solutione0
Outcome
Water uptakee0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water uptake decreases when the osmotic pressure of the solution increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake was maximal in 0.1 molar NaCl solution.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
0.1 molar naCl solutionse0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A maximum water uptake was observed at 0.1 molar naCl solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake was maximal in 0.1 molar sugar solution.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense2
Treatment
0.1 molar sugar solutionse0
Outcome
water uptakee1
Direction
maximume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.1 molar sugar solutions in each imbibitions duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“A maximum water uptake was observed at 0.1 molar naCl solutions and 0.1 molar sugar solutions in each imbibitions duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake was least at 3 molar solution.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense2
Treatment
3 molare0
Outcome
water uptakee1
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the least at 3 molar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–862 · show in text ↑
e1

“water uptake was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–750 · show in text ↑
e2

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake was maximal at 20 oC after 96 h.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
20 oCe0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
after 96 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water uptake was maximum at 20 oC after 96 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake was least at 30 oC.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense2
Treatment
30 oCe0
Outcome
water uptakee1
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the least at 30 oC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“water uptake was maximum at 20 oC after 96 h, and the least at 30 oC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–984 · show in text ↑
e2

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA promoted germination significantly.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
iAAe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
promotivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The promotive effect of germination promoting chemicals (10 and 100 ppm iAA and GA3) was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 promoted germination significantly.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
promotivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The promotive effect of germination promoting chemicals (10 and 100 ppm iAA and GA3) was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA decreased salinity stress up to 1.5%.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
salinity stresse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
up to 1.5% levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An application of IAA and GA3 decreased the salinity stress up to 1.5% level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 decreased salinity stress up to 1.5%.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
salinity stresse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
up to 1.5% levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An application of IAA and GA3 decreased the salinity stress up to 1.5% level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 was more effective than IAA at 0.5 and 1.0% NaCl.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
at 0.5 and 1.0% NaCle0
Comparator
IAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 proves more effective than IAA at 0.5 and 1.0% NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal germination temperature was 25 oC.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
25 oCe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
optimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 oC was found to be the optimal temperature for germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light did not significantly affect seed germination.

Taxon
Anethum graveolens l.Anethum graveolense1
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
seed germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light did not significantly affect seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anethum graveolens l. (dill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–316 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.