Paper · 2011

Effect of soil tillage system on soil properties and yield in some arable crops

Teodor Rusu; Paula Ioana Moraru; Ioan ROTAR

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The paper presents the influence of the conventional ploughing tillage technology in comparison with the minimum tillage, upon the soil properties, weed control and yield in the case of maize (Zea mays L.), soya-bean (Glycine hispida L.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a three years crop rotation. The use of minimum soil tillage systems within a three years rotation: maize, soya-bean, wheat favorites the rise of the aggregates hydro stability with 5.6-7.5% on a 0-20 cm depth and 5-11% on 20-30 cm depth. The soil tillage system influences the productivity elements of cultivated species and finally the yields thus obtained. Thus, related to conventional working system, the yields in minimum tillage working represented 89-97% in maize, 103-112% in soya-bean and 93-99% in winter-wheat. The results of investigations showed that the yield is a cobined effect of soil tillage systems influence on soil properties, plant density assurance and on weed control. Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel. At variants worked with paraplow were obtained quality indices close to those of the variant worked with plow, and protein and gluten content was even higher. At Ariesan variety, highest protein content, 12.50% and gluten, 28.6% was obtained with paraplow treatment. .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage increased aggregate hydrostability by 5.6-7.5% at 0-20 cm depth relative to conventional ploughing.

Taxon
maize, soya-bean, wheate1
Treatment
minimum soil tillage systemse1
Outcome
aggregates hydro stabilitye1
Direction
risee1
Value
5.6-7.5%e1
Qualifier
0-20 cm depthe1
Comparator
conventional ploughingt0

Verbatim

e1

“The use of minimum soil tillage systems within a three years rotation: maize, soya-bean, wheat favorites the rise of the aggregates hydro stability with 5.6-7.5% on a 0-20 cm depth and 5-11% on 20-30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“The paper presents the influence of the conventional ploughing tillage technology in comparison with the minimum tillage, upon the soil properties, weed control and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage increased aggregate hydrostability by 5-11% at 20-30 cm depth relative to conventional ploughing.

Taxon
maize, soya-bean, wheate1
Treatment
minimum soil tillage systemse1
Outcome
aggregates hydro stabilitye1
Direction
risee1
Value
5-11%e1
Qualifier
20-30 cm depthe1
Comparator
conventional ploughingt0

Verbatim

e1

“The use of minimum soil tillage systems within a three years rotation: maize, soya-bean, wheat favorites the rise of the aggregates hydro stability with 5.6-7.5% on a 0-20 cm depth and 5-11% on 20-30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“The paper presents the influence of the conventional ploughing tillage technology in comparison with the minimum tillage, upon the soil properties, weed control and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield under minimum tillage was 89-97% of the conventional system.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
minimum tillagee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
89-97%e2
Comparator
conventional working systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“related to conventional working system, the yields in minimum tillage working represented 89-97% in maize, 103-112% in soya-bean and 93-99% in winter-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soya-bean yield under minimum tillage was 103-112% of the conventional system.

Taxon
soya-beane2
Treatment
minimum tillagee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
103-112%e2
Comparator
conventional working systeme2

Verbatim

e2

“related to conventional working system, the yields in minimum tillage working represented 89-97% in maize, 103-112% in soya-bean and 93-99% in winter-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield under minimum tillage was 93-99% of the conventional system.

Taxon
winter-wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
minimum tillagee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
93-99%e2
Comparator
conventional working systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“related to conventional working system, the yields in minimum tillage working represented 89-97% in maize, 103-112% in soya-bean and 93-99% in winter-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under minimum tillage, the paraplow variant gave the best winter wheat quality indices, followed by rotary harrow and chisel.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
paraplowe3
Outcome
quality indicese3
Direction
best resultse3
Comparator
rotary harrow and chisele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraplow gave wheat quality indices close to those of the plow variant.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
paraplowe4
Outcome
quality indicese4
Direction
closee4
Comparator
plowe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1209 · show in text ↑
e4

“At variants worked with paraplow were obtained quality indices close to those of the variant worked with plow, and protein and gluten content was even higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraplow gave even higher protein and gluten content than plow in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
paraplowe4
Outcome
protein and gluten contente4
Direction
even highere4
Comparator
plowe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1209 · show in text ↑
e4

“At variants worked with paraplow were obtained quality indices close to those of the variant worked with plow, and protein and gluten content was even higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ariesan wheat under paraplow had the highest protein content, 12.50%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Material
Ariesane5
Treatment
paraplow treatmente5
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
higheste5
Value
12.50%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1209 · show in text ↑
e5

“At Ariesan variety, highest protein content, 12.50% and gluten, 28.6% was obtained with paraplow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ariesan wheat under paraplow had the highest gluten content, 28.6%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Material
Ariesane5
Treatment
paraplow treatmente5
Outcome
glutene5
Direction
higheste5
Value
28.6%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under minimum tillage systems in the case of winter wheat as an option for replacing classic ploughing, the best results in terms of quality indices were obtained from version worked with paraplow, followed by rotary harrow and chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1209 · show in text ↑
e5

“At Ariesan variety, highest protein content, 12.50% and gluten, 28.6% was obtained with paraplow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1476 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil tillage system influences the productivity elements of cultivated species and their yields.

Taxon
cultivated speciese7
Treatment
soil tillage systeme7
Outcome
productivity elementse7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e7

“The soil tillage system influences the productivity elements of cultivated species and finally the yields thus obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–639 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.