Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Broadleaf Weed Management in Grain Sorghum with Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides

Enrique Rosales-Robles; Ricardo Sanchez-de-la-Cruz; Jaime Salinas-Garcia; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

2,4-D is the most widely used herbicide for weed control in grain sorghum in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico. Crop injury caused by 2,4-D drift to nontarget crops commonly occurs because of prevailing high winds. Field experiments were conducted from 2001 to 2003 to evaluate an integrated weed management program in grain sorghum with alternative postemergence herbicides to 2,4-D at registered and reduced rates. Bromoxynil applied at 480 (registered rate), 360, and 240 g/ha provided excellent broadleaf weed control when adequate rainfall occurred. Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha applied broadcast without cultivation provided excellent weed control and sorghum yield comparable with 28.5 g/ha (registered rate). This treatment represented a 32% cost reduction and 50% reduction in herbicide input compared with prosulfuron applied at registered rate without cultivation, and 31% cost reduction compared with 2,4-D at the registered rate (590 g ae/ha) plus cultivation, considered the commercial standard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil at 480 g/ha controlled broadleaf weeds well when rainfall was adequate.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Bromoxynil applied at 480 (registered rate)e0
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Qualifier
when adequate rainfall occurrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bromoxynil applied at 480 (registered rate), 360, and 240 g/ha provided excellent broadleaf weed control when adequate rainfall occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil at 360 g/ha controlled broadleaf weeds well when rainfall was adequate.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
360e0
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Qualifier
when adequate rainfall occurrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bromoxynil applied at 480 (registered rate), 360, and 240 g/ha provided excellent broadleaf weed control when adequate rainfall occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil at 240 g/ha controlled broadleaf weeds well when rainfall was adequate.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
240 g/hae0
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Qualifier
when adequate rainfall occurrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bromoxynil applied at 480 (registered rate), 360, and 240 g/ha provided excellent broadleaf weed control when adequate rainfall occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha without cultivation provided excellent weed control.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha applied broadcast without cultivatione0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha applied broadcast without cultivation provided excellent weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha without cultivation gave sorghum yield comparable to 28.5 g/ha.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha applied broadcast without cultivatione0
Outcome
sorghum yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
28.5 g/ha (registered rate)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Prosulfuron at 14.2 g/ha applied broadcast without cultivation provided excellent weed control and sorghum yield comparable with 28.5 g/ha (registered rate).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-rate prosulfuron lowered cost by 32% compared with registered-rate prosulfuron without cultivation.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
cost reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
prosulfuron applied at registered rate without cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment represented a 32% cost reduction and 50% reduction in herbicide input compared with prosulfuron applied at registered rate without cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-rate prosulfuron lowered herbicide input by 50% compared with registered-rate prosulfuron without cultivation.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
herbicide inpute0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
prosulfuron applied at registered rate without cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment represented a 32% cost reduction and 50% reduction in herbicide input compared with prosulfuron applied at registered rate without cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-rate prosulfuron lowered cost by 31% compared with registered-rate 2,4-D plus cultivation.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
cost reductione0
Outcome
cost reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
2,4-D at the registered rate (590 g ae/ha) plus cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“31% cost reduction compared with 2,4-D at the registered rate (590 g ae/ha) plus cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–962 · show in text ↑

Prosulfuron · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.