Paper · 2015 · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture

Physiological Reactions of Sunflower Plants to Different Spices of Selenium

Farzaneh Garousi; Béla Kovacs; Éva Bodi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Selenium (Se) is an example of an essential element becoming more and more insufficient in food crops as a result of intensive plant production in many countries. Se is an essential biological micronutrient in diet of animals and humans, and plant foods are important sources of dietary Se. It is an essential constituent of several enzymes in which it is present in the form of the unusual amino acid selenocysteine (SeCys). Then, engineering food crops to accumulate higher levels of Se would provide adequate Se to target population. In this study, two species of soluble inorganic selenium forms, selenite (Se IV ) and selenate (Se VI ) at different concentrations were investigated on sunflower plants that were growing in nutrient solutions during 3 weeks and at the end of the experiment, amounts of SLA for first and second leaves of sunflower were measured. In accordance with the results that we observed, our regarded Se concentrations in Se IV form have not been had positive effect on sunflower plants. Whereas samples that had been treated with 0.3 mg.L -1 Se VI , had the high SLA amount and for second leaves, this increase was significantly. Although high level of 0.9 mg.L -1 and 3 mg.L -1 Se VI had negative affect on growth of the samples that had been treated by them.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenite concentrations did not positively affect sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Se concentrations in Se IV forme0
Outcome
sunflower plantse0
Direction
not been had positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Se concentrations in Se IV form have not been had positive effect on sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 mg.L -1 selenate, sunflower SLA was high.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
0.3 mg.L -1 Se VIe0
Outcome
SLA amounte0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“samples that had been treated with 0.3 mg.L -1 Se VI , had the high SLA amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 mg.L -1 selenate, SLA increase in second leaves was significant.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
second leavese0
Treatment
0.3 mg.L -1 Se VIe1
Outcome
second leavese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for second leaves, this increase was significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“treated with 0.3 mg.L -1 Se VI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.9 mg.L -1 selenate, growth was negatively affected.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
0.9 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
negative affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high level of 0.9 mg.L -1 and 3 mg.L -1 Se VI had negative affect on growth of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 3 mg.L -1 selenate, growth was negatively affected.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
3 mg.L -1 Se VIe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
negative affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high level of 0.9 mg.L -1 and 3 mg.L -1 Se VI had negative affect on growth of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–43 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.