Paper · 2015 · Pharmaceutical Biology

Uzara – A quality control perspective ofXysmalobium undulatum

Sowesa Kanama; Alvaro Viljoen; Gill Enslin; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

CONTEXT: Xysmalobium undulatum (L.) Aiton f var. (Asclepiadaceae), commonly known as uzara, is an ethnomedicinally important plant from southern Africa used to treat a variety of ailments. In addition to local use in African Traditional Medicine (ATM), formulations containing uzara have been successfully marketed by a number of pharmaceutical companies. Despite its commercialization, published adequate quality control (QC) protocols are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The study was conducted to develop QC protocols for uzara based on chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) were used to develop phytochemical fingerprints of ethanolic root extracts of 47 uzara samples collected from eight distinct localities in South Africa. Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy was also explored as a suitable alternative technique for rapid and economic quantification of uzarin. RESULTS: Adequate chromatographic profiles were obtained using both HPTLC and LC-MS analyses. The chromatographic patterns showed qualitative similarities among plants collected from different locations. The levels of uzarin, the major constituent of uzara, were highly variable between locations, ranging from 17.8 to 139.9 mg/g (dry weight). A good coefficient of determination (R(2 )= 0.939) and low root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP = 7.9 mg/g) confirmed the accuracy of using MIR-PLS calibration models for the quantification of uzarin. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Both HPTLC and LC-MS can be used as tools in developing quality control procedures for uzara. MIR in combination with chemometrics provides a fast alternative method for the quantification of uzarin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPTLC and LC-MS produced adequate chromatographic profiles.

Outcome
chromatographic profilese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Adequate chromatographic profiles were obtained using both HPTLC and LC-MS analyses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from different sites had similar chromatographic patterns.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
chromatographic patternse0
Setting
different locationse0

Verbatim

e0

“The chromatographic patterns showed qualitative similarities among plants collected from different locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uzarin levels varied among locations from 17.8 to 139.9 mg/g dry weight.

Taxon
uzarae0
Outcome
levels of uzarine0
Value
17.8 to 139.9 mg/g (dry weight)e0
Setting
locationse0

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of uzarin, the major constituent of uzara, were highly variable between locations, ranging from 17.8 to 139.9 mg/g (dry weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1342 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MIR-PLS models quantified uzarin with R² of 0.939.

Outcome
coefficient of determinatione0
Value
0.939e0

Verbatim

e0

“A good coefficient of determination (R(2 )= 0.939) and low root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP = 7.9 mg/g) confirmed the accuracy of using MIR-PLS calibration models for the quantification of uzarin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MIR-PLS models quantified uzarin with prediction error of 7.9 mg/g.

Outcome
root mean square error of predictione0
Value
7.9 mg/ge0

Verbatim

e0

“A good coefficient of determination (R(2 )= 0.939) and low root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP = 7.9 mg/g) confirmed the accuracy of using MIR-PLS calibration models for the quantification of uzarin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

HPTLC and LC-MS can support uzara quality control.

Taxon
uzarae0
Outcome
quality control procedures for uzarae0

Verbatim

e0

“Both HPTLC and LC-MS can be used as tools in developing quality control procedures for uzara.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1671 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

MIR with chemometrics offers fast uzarin quantification.

Outcome
quantification of uzarine0
Comparator
alternative methode0

Verbatim

e0

“MIR in combination with chemometrics provides a fast alternative method for the quantification of uzarin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1777 · show in text ↑