Abstract
Field observations in Ohio suggested a possible interaction between soybean cyst nematode (SCN) and glyphosate in Countrymark 316 soybean, a transgenic glyphosate-resistant (R) variety that also expresses SCN resistance derived from ‘PI88788’ soybean. To investigate this possible interaction under controlled conditions, greenhouse experiments were conducted in which Countrymark 316 (R) and Corsoy 79 (S = susceptible to glyphosate and SCN) soybean root and shoot weights were measured in response to three concentrations of race 3 SCN inoculum and five glyphosate doses. Experiments were conducted in which glyphosate was applied 9, 18, or 27 d after inoculation (DAI). Data from SCN treatments in the (S) soybean experiments were regressed on glyphosate dosage and fit to a log-logistic dose–response model. SCN–glyphosate interaction in the (S) soybean variety reduced root dry weight of SCN-inoculated plants 6% compared with noninoculated plants when 1.0 kg/ha glyphosate was applied 18 DAI. The most significant interaction of SCN and glyphosate in the (S) variety occurred when glyphosate was applied 27 DAI; the glyphosate dose required to reduce shoot fresh weight 25% was 0.55 kg/ha in the noninoculated control compared with 0.32 kg/ha in plants inoculated with 1,000 SCN eggs/200 cm3 soil. Glyphosate rates of 0.84 and 1.69 kg/ha reduced root dry weights of Countrymark 316 (R) soybean 10 to 13% at the 18 DAI application timing only. Inoculation with SCN reduced shoot fresh weight of (R) soybean 8 to 29% across all experiments, but there was no interaction of glyphosate and SCN in (R) soybean.Nomenclature: Glyphosate; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Countrymark 316’ and ‘Corsoy 79’; soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines Ichinohe.Additional index words: Herbicide–nematode interaction, integrated pest management.Abbreviations: DAI, days after inoculation; EPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EC 2.5.1.19); GR25, dose required to reduce root or shoot growth by 25%; I50, dose corresponding to biomass halfway between upper- and lower-response limits; POST, postemergence; R, glyphosate SCN resistant; S, glyphosate SCN susceptible; SCN, soybean cyst nematode.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
SCN and glyphosate interaction reduced susceptible soybean root dry weight by 6%.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Material
- (S) soybean varietye0
- Treatment
- 1.0 kg/ha glyphosatee0
- Interactor
- SCNe0pest
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 6%e0
- Comparator
- noninoculated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SCN–glyphosate interaction in the (S) soybean variety reduced root dry weight of SCN-inoculated plants 6% compared with noninoculated plants when 1.0 kg/ha glyphosate was applied 18 DAI.”
Claim · model-written summary
SCN inoculation lowered the glyphosate dose for 25% shoot-weight reduction to 0.32 kg/ha versus 0.55 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- plants inoculated with 1,000 SCN eggs/200 cm3 soile0
- Interactor
- SCNe0pest
- Outcome
- glyphosate dose required to reduce shoot fresh weight 25%e0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Value
- 0.32 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 0.55 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- noninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the glyphosate dose required to reduce shoot fresh weight 25% was 0.55 kg/ha in the noninoculated control compared with 0.32 kg/ha in plants inoculated with 1,000 SCN eggs/200 cm3 soil.”
e1“soybean variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate at 0.84 and 1.69 kg/ha reduced resistant soybean root dry weight by 10 to 13% only at 18 DAI.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Material
- Countrymark 316e0
- Treatment
- Glyphosate rates of 0.84 and 1.69 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- root dry weightse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 10 to 13%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glyphosate rates of 0.84 and 1.69 kg/ha reduced root dry weights of Countrymark 316 (R) soybean 10 to 13% at the 18 DAI application timing only.”
Claim · model-written summary
SCN inoculation reduced resistant soybean shoot fresh weight by 8 to 29%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with SCNe0
- Interactor
- SCNe0pest
- Outcome
- shoot fresh weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 8 to 29%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with SCN reduced shoot fresh weight of (R) soybean 8 to 29% across all experiments”
Claim · model-written summary
No glyphosate–SCN interaction was found in resistant soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Interactor
- SCNe0pest
- Outcome
- interaction of glyphosate and SCNe0
- Direction
- no interactione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no interaction of glyphosate and SCN in (R) soybean”
The same questions in other papers
Heterodera glycines · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →glyphosate · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 323 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
354 papers more in this group
See all 358 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.