Paper · 2011 · Acta Horticulturae

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ENERGY NEEDS FOR A CONVENTIONALLY AND AN INFRARED (IR)-HEATED GREENHOUSE

A. Kavga; T. Panidis; G. Alexopoulos; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential advantages of heating greenhouses by infrared (IR) heaters, instead of conventional hot air, are examined experimentally. Measurements of indoor and outdoor conditions during a typical cold night and whole thermal period in Central Greece are taken in two experimental greenhouses using conventional and IR heating respectively. Data confirm that the conventional system inside air and cover temperature remains always higher than the temperature targeted for the plants. On the contrary, with IR heating, inside air and cover temperatures are several degrees lower than the desired temperature sustained at the plantation level, and that this temperature difference increases proportionally to the drop in outside temperature. Since all thermal losses are almost proportional to the inside and outside temperature difference it is surmised that IR heating systems successfully implemented may present significant advantage over conventional heating setups. Direct measurements of energy consumption for the two test cases indicated 35-40% savings for infrared heated greenhouse. Besides, infrared heating contributed to improved total quality of the cultivated lettuce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional heating kept air and cover temperatures above the target plant temperature.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
inside air and cover temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
temperature targeted for the plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conventional system inside air and cover temperature remains always higher than the temperature targeted for the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“improved total quality of the cultivated lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infrared heating kept air and cover temperatures below plantation level temperature, with the gap increasing as outside temperature fell.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
IR heatinge0
Outcome
inside air and cover temperaturese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
temperature difference increases proportionally to the drop in outside temperaturee0
Comparator
desired temperature sustained at the plantation levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with IR heating, inside air and cover temperatures are several degrees lower than the desired temperature sustained at the plantation level, and that this temperature difference increases proportionally to the drop in outside temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“improved total quality of the cultivated lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infrared heating saved 35-40% energy relative to conventional heating.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
infrared heated greenhousee0
Outcome
energy consumptione0
Direction
savingse0
Value
35-40%e0
Comparator
two test casese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct measurements of energy consumption for the two test cases indicated 35-40% savings for infrared heated greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“improved total quality of the cultivated lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infrared heating improved cultivated lettuce total quality.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
infrared heatinge0
Outcome
total quality of the cultivated lettucee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infrared heating contributed to improved total quality of the cultivated lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1184 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · pest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · quality: general · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.