Paper · 2015 · Agrosearch

Growth analysis of wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) as influenced by water stress and variety in Sokoto, Sudan Savannah, Nigeria

MB Sokoto; IU Abubakar

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was carried out to determine the effect of water stress and variety on growth of wheat (TriticumaestivumL.), during2009/10and 2010/11dry seasons. The treatments consisted of factorial combination of water stress at three critical growth stage which was imposed by withholding water at tillering, flowering, grain filling and control (no control) and two varieties (Star 11 TR 77173/SLM and Kauze/Weaver) laid out in a split plot design with three replications. Water stress was assigned to the main-plot, while variety was assigned to the sub-plots. Result revealed significant (P<0.05) effect of water stress, attilleringreduced plant height, LAI, CGR, and NAR. Variety had significant (P<0.05) effect on plant height, LAI, CGR and NAR. Water stress at tillering was observed to be most critical growth stage in wheat, and water stress at this period should be avoided because it results to decrease in growth components in wheat. Wheat should be sown in November or at least first week of December in this area and other area with similar climatic conditions. Star II TR 77173/ LM is recommended variety for the area.Key words: Wheat, growth, Water stress, Variety, Sudan savannah

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at tillering significantly reduced plant height, LAI, CGR and NAR.

Taxon
wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
attilleringe0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
plant height, LAI, CGR, and NARe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P<0.05) effect of water stress, attilleringreduced plant height, LAI, CGR, and NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety significantly affected plant height, LAI, CGR and NAR, with direction unspecified.

Taxon
wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
Varietye0
Outcome
plant height, LAI, CGR and NARe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variety had significant (P<0.05) effect on plant height, LAI, CGR and NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillering was the most critical wheat growth stage for water stress.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
most critical growth stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress at tillering was observed to be most critical growth stage in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–828 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend avoiding water stress at tillering.

Outcome
water stress at this period should be avoidede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress at this period should be avoided because it results to decrease in growth components in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–940 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sowing wheat in November or at least the first week of December.

Outcome
sown in November or at least first week of Decembere0
Setting
this areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat should be sown in November or at least first week of December in this area and other area with similar climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Star II TR 77173/ LM is recommended for the area.

Taxon
wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
Star II TR 77173/ LMe0
Outcome
recommended variety for the areae0
Setting
the areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Star II TR 77173/ LM is recommended variety for the area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticumaestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.