Paper · 2011 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Dead mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum protects transplanted cotton plants agains fungal wilts in a saline field

H. J. Zhang; H. Z. Dong; W. J. Li

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the dead mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum at 900-1,500 kg ha–1 effectively controlled Fusarium and Verticillium wilt of cotton. Our objective was to determine if the dead mycelium is also effective at lower rates under a cotton seedling transplanting system. Columned soil blocks (500 g each), made of fertile soil alone in the first experiment, and both soil and dead mycelium at varying rates in the second experiment, were sown with cotton seeds in 2006 and 2007. Seedlings in the mycelium-free blocks were drenched with aqueous extract of the dead mycelium after full emergence, and then transplanted to a saline field. The disease severity of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp vasinfectum and Verticillium dahliae, leaf chlorophyll and malondialdehyde concentrations, leaf photosynthetic rate and lint yield of the transplanted plants were determined. The aqueous extract at a rate of 1 to 5% provided 18.6 to 25.6% protection against Fusarium wilt but not against Verticillium wilt. Lint yield was slightly increased with the aqueous extract in 2006, but not in 2007. The incorporation of the dead mycelium to soil blocks before sowing was effective in controlling both the Fusarium and Verticillium wilts of cotton. Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w) provided 26-30% protection against Fusarium wilt and 48-50% protection against Verticillium wilt, and increased lint yield by 13-14%. Such incorporation also delayed leaf senescence as indicated by the increased leaf photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content, and reduced malondialdehyde concentrations. Incorporation of the dead mycelium of P. chrysogenum into soil blocks at a relatively lower rate (270 kg ha–1) would be an effective application mode for wilt control in sustainable cotton production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract gave 18.6 to 25.6% protection against Fusarium wilt.

Treatment
aqueous extract at a rate of 1 to 5%e0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium wilte0
Direction
protectione0
Value
18.6 to 25.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aqueous extract at a rate of 1 to 5% provided 18.6 to 25.6% protection against Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract did not protect against Verticillium wilt.

Treatment
aqueous extracte0
Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
Verticillium wilte0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aqueous extract at a rate of 1 to 5% provided 18.6 to 25.6% protection against Fusarium wilt but not against Verticillium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract slightly increased lint yield in 2006.

Treatment
aqueous extracte0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was slightly increased with the aqueous extract in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract did not increase lint yield in 2007.

Treatment
aqueous extracte0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yield was slightly increased with the aqueous extract in 2006, but not in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead mycelium at 1 to 3% gave 26-30% protection against Fusarium wilt.

Treatment
Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w)e0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium wilte0
Direction
protectione0
Value
26-30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w) provided 26-30% protection against Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead mycelium at 1 to 3% gave 48-50% protection against Verticillium wilt.

Treatment
Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w)e0
Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
Verticillium wilte0
Direction
protectione0
Value
48-50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w) provided 26-30% protection against Fusarium wilt and 48-50% protection against Verticillium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead mycelium increased lint yield by 13-14%.

Treatment
Dead myceliume0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13-14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dead mycelium applied at 1 to 3% (w/w) provided 26-30% protection against Fusarium wilt and 48-50% protection against Verticillium wilt, and increased lint yield by 13-14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead mycelium delayed leaf senescence with increased photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
Such incorporatione0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such incorporation also delayed leaf senescence as indicated by the increased leaf photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead mycelium reduced malondialdehyde concentrations.

Treatment
incorporatione0
Outcome
malondialdehyde concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such incorporation also delayed leaf senescence as indicated by the increased leaf photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content, and reduced malondialdehyde concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soil block incorporation at 270 kg ha–1 for wilt control.

Treatment
Incorporation of the dead mycelium of P. chrysogenum into soil blocks at a relatively lower rate (270 kg ha–1)e0
Interactor
P. chrysogenumPenicillium chrysogenume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
wilt controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium chrysogenum
Penicillium chrysogenum · InteractorCrulina 98 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of the dead mycelium of P. chrysogenum into soil blocks at a relatively lower rate (270 kg ha–1) would be an effective application mode for wilt control in sustainable cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

botanical · Verticillium · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.