Paper · 1992 · Experimental Agriculture

Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency as Affected by Component Population, Rhizobial Inoculation and Applied Nitrogen in Maize/Mungbean Intercropping

Mrinal K. Chowdhury; Elpidio L. Rosario

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The effects of component population, rhizobial inoculation and applied nitrogen on the efficiency of phosphorus utilization in maize/mungbean intercropping were examined in two experiments. The efficiency of phosphorus absorption decreased by between 5 and 43% in maize and by between 31 and 58% in mungbean as a result of intercropping. The overall efficiency of phosphorus absorption in intercropping decreased with increasing nitrogen level but a parallel increase in overall conversion efficiency maintained a constant and large land equivalent ratio (LER) up to the highest level of nitrogen. The increase in LER over unity, however, was due primarily to the greater total absorption of phosphorus by maize and mungbean together in intercropping compared with that when they were grown in pure stands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize phosphorus absorption efficiency by 5–43%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
efficiency of phosphorus absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
between 5 and 43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of phosphorus absorption decreased by between 5 and 43% in maize and by between 31 and 58% in mungbean as a result of intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced mungbean phosphorus absorption efficiency by 31–58%.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
efficiency of phosphorus absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
between 31 and 58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of phosphorus absorption decreased by between 5 and 43% in maize and by between 31 and 58% in mungbean as a result of intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–344 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall phosphorus absorption efficiency in the intercrop decreased with rising nitrogen.

Taxon
intercroppinge0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen levele0
Outcome
overall efficiency of phosphorus absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The overall efficiency of phosphorus absorption in intercropping decreased with increasing nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–451 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall conversion efficiency rose with nitrogen in the intercrop.

Treatment
highest level of nitrogene0
Outcome
overall conversion efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a parallel increase in overall conversion efficiency maintained a constant and large land equivalent ratio (LER) up to the highest level of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The land equivalent ratio stayed constant and large up to the highest nitrogen level.

Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Direction
constant and largee0
Qualifier
up to the highest level of nitrogene0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“maintained a constant and large land equivalent ratio (LER) up to the highest level of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–604 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercrop land equivalent ratio exceeded unity primarily because the combined crops absorbed more phosphorus than pure stands.

Taxon
maize and mungbeanZea maysVigna radiatae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
increase in LER over unitye0
Qualifier
greater total absorption of phosphoruse0
Comparator
pure standse0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in LER over unity, however, was due primarily to the greater total absorption of phosphorus by maize and mungbean together in intercropping compared with that when they were grown in pure stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–813 · show in text ↑

intercropping · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 122 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 122 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.