Paper · 2012 · Journal of Animal Science

High-moisture air-tight storage of barley and wheat improves nutrient digestibility1

H. D. Poulsen; K. Blaabjerg; J. V. Nørgaard; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) are often stored dry with 14% or less moisture, which during rainy periods may require that grains are dried after harvest. The hypothesis is that air-tight storage of high-moisture barley and wheat will increase nutrient digestibility due to chemical conversions prior to feeding. The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP. The crops were grown on 1 field keeping other factors constant. Half of the grains was harvested in the morning after a rainy day and stored in air-tight silos (DM, %: barley, 85.2; wheat, 82.8) and the other half was harvested later the same day (windy and sunny) and stored dry (DM, %: barley, 89.8; wheat, 88.3). After 6 mo of storage, 1 low- and 1 high-moisture diet were prepared with a barley:wheat ratio of 1:1 mixed with soybean (Glycine max) meal and rapeseed cake to produce a compound diet without inorganic P and microbial phytase. Sixteen 45-kg pigs housed in metabolism crates were fed either the low- or the high-moisture diet for 5 d for adaptation and 7 d for total collection of feces. Digestibility of P was 12% higher (P < 0.01) and of CP was 4% higher (P = 0.08) in the high-moisture diet. Phytase activity of dry-stored grain was lower (P < 0.01) and phytate P was 4% higher in the high-moisture stored grain vs. the grains stored dry. Overall, high-moisture storage increased digestibility of P and CP when the grain was fed to finishing pigs. Therefore, high-moisture air-tight storage saved energy (without drying) and at the same time enhanced P digestibility and increased the nutritional value of grain probably through enzymatic activity during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-moisture storage of barley and wheat raised P digestibility by 12% in the diet fed to pigs.

Treatment
high moisturee2
Outcome
Digestibility of Pe1
Direction
highere1
Value
12%e1
Comparator
dry storagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Digestibility of P was 12% higher (P < 0.01) and of CP was 4% higher (P = 0.08) in the high-moisture diet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1278 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-moisture storage of barley and wheat raised CP digestibility by 4% in the diet fed to pigs, P = 0.08.

Treatment
high moisturee2
Outcome
Digestibilitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
4%e1
Qualifier
of CPe1
Comparator
dry storagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Digestibility of P was 12% higher (P < 0.01) and of CP was 4% higher (P = 0.08) in the high-moisture diet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1278 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-stored grain had lower phytase activity than high-moisture stored grain.

Treatment
dry-stored graine3
Outcome
Phytase activitye3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
high-moisture stored graine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Phytase activity of dry-stored grain was lower (P < 0.01) and phytate P was 4% higher in the high-moisture stored grain vs. the grains stored dry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1425 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-moisture stored grain had 4% more phytate P than grain stored dry.

Treatment
high-moisture stored graine3
Outcome
phytate Pe3
Direction
highere3
Value
4%e3
Comparator
the grains stored drye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Phytase activity of dry-stored grain was lower (P < 0.01) and phytate P was 4% higher in the high-moisture stored grain vs. the grains stored dry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1425 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend high-moisture air-tight storage because it saved energy by avoiding drying of barley and wheat.

Outcome
saved energye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“high-moisture air-tight storage saved energy (without drying)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1608 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-moisture air-tight storage enhanced P digestibility of grain, probably through enzymatic activity during storage.

Outcome
enhanced P digestibilitye6
Qualifier
probably through enzymatic activity during storagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“enhanced P digestibility and increased the nutritional value of grain probably through enzymatic activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1750 · show in text ↑
e2

“The objective was to evaluate the effect of high moisture compared to dry storage of barley and wheat on digestibility of P and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑

storage · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

storage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.