Paper · 1982 · New Phytologist

THE DISTRIBUTION OF CARBON AND THE DEMAND OF THE FUNGAL SYMBIONT IN LEEK PLANTS WITH VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAS

R. C. SNELLGROVE; W. E. SPLITTSTOESSER; D. P. STRIBLEY; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
231
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae. They were pulse‐fed with 14 CO 2 in an apparatus which allowed CO 2 subsequently respired either by the shoots or by the roots plus soil to be separately monitored. There were three experiments. In two, plants were harvested 48 h after labelling and in the third after 214 h. At harvest, the distribution of 14 C between shoot, root, soil organic matter and root washings was measured. Similar growth curves for M and NM plants were obtained by supplying extra phosphorus to the latter, so that C distributions for both treatments could be compared directly. In all three experiments, about 7 % more of the total fixed C was translocated from shoot to root in M plants compared to NM plants. In the third experiment, this extra translocate could be accounted for by increased root respiration plus increased loss of C to the soil but, despite this drain, M and NM plants had equal rates of C assimilation per unit of leaf area. However, shoots of M plants had a lower content of dry matter and hence higher assimilation rates expressed on a dry matter basis. Increased hydration is suggested as a mechanism whereby leaf area and hence C assimilation increases in mycorrhizal plants and which offsets the effects of the drain imposed by the mycorrhizas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal leek translocated about seven percent more fixed carbon from shoots to roots than nonmycorrhizal leek.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
total fixed C was translocated from shoot to roote0
Direction
moree0
Value
7 %e0
Comparator
NM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about 7 % more of the total fixed C was translocated from shoot to root in M plants compared to NM plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third experiment the additional translocate was accounted for by increased root respiration.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
root respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
not (NM)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this extra translocate could be accounted for by increased root respiration plus increased loss of C to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third experiment the additional translocate was also accounted for by greater carbon loss to soil.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
loss of C to the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
not (NM)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this extra translocate could be accounted for by increased root respiration plus increased loss of C to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants had equal carbon assimilation rates per leaf area.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
rates of C assimilation per unit of leaf areae0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
NM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M and NM plants had equal rates of C assimilation per unit of leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal shoots had lower dry matter content.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
content of dry mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
not (NM)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots of M plants had a lower content of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had higher carbon assimilation per unit dry matter.

Treatment
inoculated (M)e1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
assimilation rates expressed on a dry matter basise0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
not (NM)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher assimilation rates expressed on a dry matter basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed that increased hydration raises leaf area and assimilation, offsetting the mycorrhizal carbon drain.

Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
C assimilation increasese0
Qualifier
Increased hydratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased hydration is suggested as a mechanism whereby leaf area and hence C assimilation increases in mycorrhizal plants and which offsets the effects of the drain imposed by the mycorrhizas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leek plants (Allium porrum) were grown on partially sterilized soil either inoculated (M) or not (NM) with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Allium ampeloprasum (leek)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.