Paper · 1999 · Annals of Botany

A Space-time Model of Carbon Translocation along a Shoot Bearing Fruits

C BRUCHOU

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
31
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A carbon-based model is described of the source-sink relationships of a stem bearing fruits in space and time and focusing on growth variability along the branch. The novelty of the model comes from the aggregation of physiological processes taking into account spatial aspects. The stem is represented as a set of compartments (metamers) connected to source (leafy shoots) and sink (fruits) compartments. Each leafy shoot forms one compartment. The fruit consists of three compartments involved in translocation (cytoplasm), structure (cell wall) and storage (vacuole). Physiological processes considered are photosynthesis, respiration of fruits and leaves, translocation of assimilates and fruit growth. Assimilate production is regulated by sink strength. Carbon translocation between two compartments depends on the gradient of assimilate concentration. The gradient induces carbon translocation from the most to the least concentrated compartment, except for the vacuole compartment into which translocation is possible whatever the concentration gradient. Fruit growth, in terms of fresh weight, results from the phloem water supplied to the fruit according to the concentration gradient between the fruit and the stem. The model is calibrated for peach trees by comparing observed and simulated fruit dry and fresh weights for a shoot with normal fruit load. The model simulates variability between peach fruits and the effect of contrasting fruit loads. According to this model, photosynthesis increases and assimilate concentrations in leaves and phloem decrease with decreasing leaf:fruit ratio as reported in the literature. Simulated concentrations of assimilates in the phloem range from 2 to 14%. Simulated concentration gradients and specific mass transfer for peach trees range from 0.05 to 0.17 g cm −3 m −1 and from 0 to 3 g cm −2 h −1 , respectively, and are of the same order of magnitude as those reported for various other tree species. The model is used to analyse the effect of fruit position relative to the leaves. Copyright 1999 Annals of Botany Company

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model simulates variability among peach fruits.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Outcome
variability between peach fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The model simulates variability between peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1419 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model is calibrated for peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model simulates the effect of contrasting fruit loads.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Outcome
effect of contrasting fruit loadse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of contrasting fruit loads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1461 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model is calibrated for peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modelled photosynthesis increases as the leaf:fruit ratio decreases.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
decreasing leaf:fruit ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthesis increases and assimilate concentrations in leaves and phloem decrease with decreasing leaf:fruit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1605 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model is calibrated for peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modelled assimilate concentrations in leaves and phloem decrease as the leaf:fruit ratio decreases.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Organ / stage
leaves and phloeme0
Outcome
assimilate concentrations in leaves and phloeme0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
decreasing leaf:fruit ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthesis increases and assimilate concentrations in leaves and phloem decrease with decreasing leaf:fruit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1605 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model is calibrated for peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated phloem assimilate concentrations range from 2 to 14%.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Organ / stage
phloeme0
Outcome
concentrations of assimilates in the phloeme0
Value
2 to 14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated concentrations of assimilates in the phloem range from 2 to 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1710 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model is calibrated for peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated concentration gradients for peach trees range from 0.05 to 0.17 g cm −3 m −1.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae0
Outcome
concentration gradientse0
Value
0.05 to 0.17 g cm −3 m −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated concentration gradients and specific mass transfer for peach trees range from 0.05 to 0.17 g cm −3 m −1 and from 0 to 3 g cm −2 h −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1854 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated specific mass transfer for peach trees ranges from 0 to 3 g cm −2 h −1.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae0
Outcome
specific mass transfere0
Value
0 to 3 g cm −2 h −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated concentration gradients and specific mass transfer for peach trees range from 0.05 to 0.17 g cm −3 m −1 and from 0 to 3 g cm −2 h −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1854 · show in text ↑