Paper · 2002 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Maize Leaves Turn Away from Neighbors

Gustavo Angel Maddonni; Marı́a Elena Otegui; Bruno Andrieu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
178
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In commercial crops, maize (Zea mays) plants are typically grown at a larger distance between rows (70 cm) than within the same row (16-23 cm). This rectangular arrangement creates a heterogeneous environment in which the plants receive higher red light (R) to far-red light (FR) ratios from the interrow spaces. In field crops, the hybrid Dekalb 696 (DK696) showed an increased proportion of leaves toward interrow spaces, whereas the experimental hybrid 980 (Exp980) retained random leaf orientation. Mirrors reflecting FR were placed close to isolated plants to simulate the presence of neighbors in the field. In addition, localized FR was applied to target leaves in a growth chamber. During their expansion, the leaves of DK696 turned away from the low R to FR ratio signals, whereas Exp980 leaves remained unaffected. On the contrary, tillering was reduced and plant height was increased by low R to FR ratios in Exp980 but not in DK696. Isolated plants preconditioned with low R/FR-simulating neighbors in a North-South row showed reduced mutual shading among leaves when the plants were actually grouped in North-South rows. These observations contradict the current view that phytochrome-mediated responses to low R/FR are a relic from wild conditions, detrimental for crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-grown DK696 had more leaves facing interrow spaces.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Dekalb 696 (DK696)e0
Outcome
proportion of leaves toward interrow spacese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“the hybrid Dekalb 696 (DK696) showed an increased proportion of leaves toward interrow spaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exp980 retained random leaf orientation in field crops.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
experimental hybrid 980 (Exp980)e0
Outcome
random leaf orientatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“the experimental hybrid 980 (Exp980) retained random leaf orientation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expanding DK696 leaves turned away from low R to FR signals.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
DK696e0
Treatment
low R to FR ratio signalse0
Outcome
turned away from the low R to FR ratio signalse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“the leaves of DK696 turned away from the low R to FR ratio signals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exp980 leaf orientation remained unaffected by low R to FR signals.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Exp980e0
Outcome
leaves remained unaffectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exp980 leaves remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low R to FR reduced tillering in Exp980.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Exp980e0
Treatment
low R to FR ratiose0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
DK696e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“tillering was reduced and plant height was increased by low R to FR ratios in Exp980 but not in DK696”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low R to FR increased height in Exp980.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
Exp980e0
Treatment
low R to FR ratiose0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
DK696e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“tillering was reduced and plant height was increased by low R to FR ratios in Exp980 but not in DK696”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low R to FR did not alter tillering or height in DK696.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
DK696e0
Treatment
low R to FR ratiose0
Outcome
tillering was reduced and plant height was increasede0
Comparator
Exp980e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“tillering was reduced and plant height was increased by low R to FR ratios in Exp980 but not in DK696”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor-signal preconditioning reduced mutual leaf shading after plants were grouped in north-south rows.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
low R/FR-simulating neighborse0
Outcome
mutual shading among leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Isolated plants preconditioned with low R/FR-simulating neighbors in a North-South row showed reduced mutual shading among leaves when the plants were actually grouped in North-South rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1132 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 29 positive, 28 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.