Paper · 2009 · eScholarship (California Digital Library)

Absorption of Foliar-Applied Nitrogen by Cotton

Derrick M. Oosterhuis

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Foliar application of N to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a common practice, but there is a lack of published information concerning the absorption and translocation of the N by the cotton plant. Field studies were conducted to study the characteristics of the cotton leaf cuticle, the effects of water deficit stress, and the absorption of foliar-applied nitrogen. Water stress increased the cuticle thickness by 33% and also changed the qualitative composition of cuticular waxes to more long chain molecular waxes of greater hydrophobicity that reduced fertilizer absorption. The thickness of the leaf cuticle increased with leaf age and this was correlated with a decrease in absorption of foliar-applied 15N-urea. Applications made either late afternoon or early morning were more effectively absorbed than those made at mid-day, and this was more pronounced for water-stressed plants. Foliar-applied urea N was rapidly taken up by the sympodial leaf, with 30%, 47% and 70% recovery within 1 h, 24 h and 192 h after application, respectively. Rapidly developing fruits were the major sinks for foliar-applied N with the boll closer to the site of application being the strongest sink. The percentage of 15N recovered in the petioles, bracts, branches, main-stem leaves was negligible. These studies showed that foliar-applied urea is readily absorbed by the cotton plant and translocated to the closest developing fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased cotton cuticle thickness by 33%.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
cuticle thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress increased the cuticle thickness by 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress shifted cuticular waxes toward longer chain, more hydrophobic molecules.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
qualitative composition of cuticular waxese0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
more long chain molecular waxes of greater hydrophobicitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress increased the cuticle thickness by 33% and also changed the qualitative composition of cuticular waxes to more long chain molecular waxes of greater hydrophobicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hydrophobic wax change reduced fertilizer absorption.

Outcome
fertilizer absorptione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
more long chain molecular waxes of greater hydrophobicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more long chain molecular waxes of greater hydrophobicity that reduced fertilizer absorption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf cuticle thickness increased with leaf age.

Organ / stage
leaf agee0
Outcome
thickness of the leaf cuticlee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The thickness of the leaf cuticle increased with leaf age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater leaf age and cuticle thickness correlated with lower absorption of foliar 15N-urea.

Organ / stage
leaf cuticlee0
Outcome
absorption of foliar-applied 15N-ureae0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The thickness of the leaf cuticle increased with leaf age and this was correlated with a decrease in absorption of foliar-applied 15N-urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late afternoon applications were absorbed more effectively than midday applications.

Treatment
late afternoone0
Outcome
absorbede0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
mid-daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications made either late afternoon or early morning were more effectively absorbed than those made at mid-day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early morning applications were absorbed more effectively than midday applications.

Treatment
early morninge0
Outcome
absorbede0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
mid-daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications made either late afternoon or early morning were more effectively absorbed than those made at mid-day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application time difference was stronger in water-stressed plants.

Outcome
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
water-stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this was more pronounced for water-stressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sympodial leaves recovered 30% of applied urea N within 1 h.

Organ / stage
sympodial leafe0
Outcome
recoverye0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
1 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied urea N was rapidly taken up by the sympodial leaf, with 30%, 47% and 70% recovery within 1 h, 24 h and 192 h after application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sympodial leaves recovered 47% of applied urea N within 24 h.

Organ / stage
sympodial leafe0
Outcome
recoverye0
Value
47%e0
Qualifier
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied urea N was rapidly taken up by the sympodial leaf, with 30%, 47% and 70% recovery within 1 h, 24 h and 192 h after application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sympodial leaves recovered 70% of applied urea N within 192 h.

Organ / stage
sympodial leafe0
Outcome
recoverye0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
192 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied urea N was rapidly taken up by the sympodial leaf, with 30%, 47% and 70% recovery within 1 h, 24 h and 192 h after application, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Developing fruits were the main sinks of foliar applied nitrogen.

Organ / stage
Rapidly developing fruitse0
Outcome
major sinks for foliar-applied Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rapidly developing fruits were the major sinks for foliar-applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The boll nearest application was the strongest nitrogen sink.

Organ / stage
bolle0
Outcome
strongest sinke0
Qualifier
closer to the site of applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the boll closer to the site of application being the strongest sink.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of 15N in petioles, bracts, branches and main stem leaves was negligible.

Organ / stage
petioles, bracts, branches, main-stem leavese0
Outcome
percentage of 15N recoverede0
Direction
negligiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of 15N recovered in the petioles, bracts, branches, main-stem leaves was negligible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.