Paper · 2000 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat to Drought Stress

V. Chandrasekar; R. K. Sairam; G. C. Srivastava

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
144
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the physiological and biochemical responses of two hexaploids viz., C 306 (water stress tolerant) and Hira (water stress susceptible), and two tetraploids, HW 24 ( Triticum dicoccum ) and A 9‐30‐1 ( Triticum durum ) wheat genotypes to water stress under pot culture condition. Water stress was imposed for a uniform period of 10 days at 50, 60 and 70 days after sowing (DAS) and observations were recorded at 60, 70 and 80 DAS. Total dry matter and plant height were recorded at harvest. Water stress caused a decline in relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability and nitrate reductase activity and increased accumulation of proline at all stages and abscisic acid (ABA) at 80 DAS in all the genotypes. Both the tetraploids showed a lower reduction in RWC and highest ABA accumulation under water stress. Among the hexaploids Hira showed the most decline in RWC and the lowest ABA accumulation. The tetraploids also showed comparatively higher carotenoid content and membrane stability, closely followed by C 306, while Hira showed the minimum response under water stress. Nitrate reductase activity and chlorophyll content under irrigated conditions were highest in Hira but under water stress the lowest per cent decline was observed in C 306, followed by HW 24, A 9‐30‐1, and Hira. Proline accumulation under water stress conditions was highest in hexaploids C 306 and Hira and lowest in tetraploids HW 24 and A 9‐30‐1. Tetraploids HW 24, followed by A 9‐30‐1 maintained higher plant height and total dry matter (TDM) under water stress and also showed a lower per cent decline under stress than hexaploids C 306 and Hira. From the results it is clear that proline accumulation did not contribute to better drought tolerance of tetraploids than hexaploids. It is also apparent that water stress tolerance is the result of the cumulative action of various physiological processes, and all the parameters/processes may not be positively associated with the drought tolerance of a particular tolerant genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress lowered RWC, chlorophyll, carotenoids, membrane stability, and nitrate reductase activity in all genotypes.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress caused a decline in relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability and nitrate reductase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased proline at all stages and ABA at 80 DAS.

Treatment
Water stresse2
Outcome
accumulation of prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased accumulation of proline at all stages and abscisic acid (ABA) at 80 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water stress caused a decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–560 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploids had less RWC reduction and greatest ABA accumulation under stress.

Material
tetraploidse0
Outcome
lower reduction in RWC and highest ABA accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the tetraploids showed a lower reduction in RWC and highest ABA accumulation under water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–274 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hira had the greatest RWC decline and lowest ABA accumulation among hexaploids.

Material
Hirae0
Outcome
most decline in RWC and the lowest ABA accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the hexaploids Hira showed the most decline in RWC and the lowest ABA accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploids had higher carotenoids and membrane stability than Hira under stress, with C 306 close behind.

Material
tetraploidse0
Outcome
carotenoid content and membrane stabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tetraploids also showed comparatively higher carotenoid content and membrane stability, closely followed by C 306, while Hira showed the minimum response under water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hira had highest nitrate reductase and chlorophyll under irrigation; C 306 had lowest declines under stress.

Material
Hirae0
Outcome
Nitrate reductase activity and chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate reductase activity and chlorophyll content under irrigated conditions were highest in Hira but under water stress the lowest per cent decline was observed in C 306, followed by HW 24, A 9‐30‐1, and Hira.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation under stress was highest in C 306 and Hira and lowest in the tetraploids.

Outcome
Proline accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline accumulation under water stress conditions was highest in hexaploids C 306 and Hira and lowest in tetraploids HW 24 and A 9‐30‐1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HW 24 followed by A 9‐30‐1 maintained higher height and dry matter and lower stress declines than hexaploids.

Material
HW 24e0
Outcome
plant height and total dry matter (TDM)e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetraploids HW 24, followed by A 9‐30‐1 maintained higher plant height and total dry matter (TDM) under water stress and also showed a lower per cent decline under stress than hexaploids C 306 and Hira.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded proline accumulation did not account for the tetraploids’ superior drought tolerance.

Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
proline accumulation did not contributee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline accumulation did not contribute to better drought tolerance of tetraploids than hexaploids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.