Paper · 1963 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Studies on the Expansion of the Leaf Surface: II. THE INFLUENCE OF LIGHT INTENSITY AND DAYLENGTH

PETER NEWTON

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The parts played by constant amounts of visible radiation per day and its two components—daylength and intensity—in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus have been investigated. The amount of radiation per day had a far greater influence than either of its components per se. Nevertheless, small significant effects of photoperiod were found, leaf expansion and dry weight increase being greatest at daylengths between 10 and 15 hr. rather than with longer days which, with similar daily totals, would be expected to give the greatest amounts of assimilation. Rates of leaf production and appearance were greatest with the highest amounts of radiation, but the rates of expansion of individual leaves and their maximum areas were greatest with intermediate amounts of radiation. This response resulted in an optimum curve relating the leaf surface and the dry weight attained after a given period to radiation. The amount of radiation giving the maximum leaf surface and dry weight decreased with age and with external nutrient supply, but at any one age was higher for increase in dry weight than for increase in leaf surface; stem and root tissues responded more to high radiation than did the leaf surface. The net assimilation rate was a linear function of visible radiation over the range of 15–120 cal. cm.-2 day-1 explored, the highest value of radiation used representing the intensity at which photosynthesis would be expected to be maximal over a 12–15 hr. day. The inhibitory effect of high radiation on leaf expansion and the resultant influence on the growth of the plant are explained in terms of the number and intensity of ‘sinks’ for carbohydrate and mineral nutrients within the plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of radiation per day had a far greater influence on growth than either of its components (daylength and intensity).

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
amount of radiation per daye1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
far greatere1
Comparator
either of its componentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of radiation per day had a far greater influence than either of its components per se”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Small significant effects of photoperiod: leaf expansion and dry weight increase were greatest at daylengths of 10 to 15 hr rather than with longer days.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
photoperiode2
Outcome
leaf expansion and dry weight increasee2
Direction
greateste2
Value
10 and 15 hre2
Comparator
longer dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“small significant effects of photoperiod were found, leaf expansion and dry weight increase being greatest at daylengths between 10 and 15 hr. rather than with longer days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates of leaf production and appearance were greatest with the highest amounts of radiation.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
amounts of radiatione3
Outcome
Rates of leaf production and appearancee3
Direction
greateste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rates of leaf production and appearance were greatest with the highest amounts of radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates of expansion of individual leaves and their maximum areas were greatest with intermediate amounts of radiation.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
intermediate amounts of radiatione4
Outcome
the rates of expansion of individual leaves and their maximum arease4
Direction
greateste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“the rates of expansion of individual leaves and their maximum areas were greatest with intermediate amounts of radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf expansion and growth response to radiation formed an optimum curve relating leaf surface and dry weight after a given period to radiation.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
radiatione5
Outcome
the leaf surface and the dry weight attained after a given periode5
Direction
optimume5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“This response resulted in an optimum curve relating the leaf surface and the dry weight attained after a given period to radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–913 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of radiation giving maximum leaf surface and dry weight decreased with plant age.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
agee6
Outcome
The amount of radiation giving the maximum leaf surface and dry weighte6
Direction
decreasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“The amount of radiation giving the maximum leaf surface and dry weight decreased with age and with external nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of radiation giving maximum leaf surface and dry weight decreased with external nutrient supply.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
external nutrient supplye6
Outcome
The amount of radiation giving the maximum leaf surface and dry weighte6
Direction
decreasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“The amount of radiation giving the maximum leaf surface and dry weight decreased with age and with external nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At any one age, the radiation amount giving the maximum was higher for dry weight increase than for leaf surface increase.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
increase in dry weighte7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
increase in leaf surfacee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“at any one age was higher for increase in dry weight than for increase in leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and root tissues responded more to high radiation than did the leaf surface.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
stem and root tissuese1
Treatment
high radiatione1
Outcome
respondede1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
the leaf surfacee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem and root tissues responded more to high radiation than did the leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1212 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibitory effect of high radiation on leaf expansion is explained by the number and intensity of sinks for carbohydrate and mineral nutrients.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
The inhibitory effect of high radiation on leaf expansione2
Qualifier
number and intensity ofe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inhibitory effect of high radiation on leaf expansion and the resultant influence on the growth of the plant are explained in terms of the number and intensity of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1642 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The net assimilation rate was a linear function of visible radiation over 15–120 cal. cm.-2 day-1.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
visible radiatione3
Outcome
net assimilation ratee3
Value
15–120 cal. cm.-2 day-1e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in influencing the growth of Cucumis sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“The net assimilation rate was a linear function of visible radiation over the range of 15–120 cal. cm.-2 day-1 explored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1333 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

83 papers: 53 positive, 30 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

radiation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.