Paper · 1910 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The Interpretation of Experimental Results

T. B. Wood; F. J. M. Stratton

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Attention is drawn to the need for caution in interpreting experimental results. Frequency curves are discussed, chiefly from the point of view of their bearing on the legitimacy of averaging results. The method of calculating probable error is described and its meaning explained. The application of probable error methods to questions of sampling for analysis, to field experiments and to feeding experiments, are illustrated by instances. The probable error of one animal on a fattening ration is found to be about 14 per cent, of the live-weight increase produced, from which it is calculated that to obtain a precision of 10 per cent, in an ordinary feeding experiment 29 animals must be fed on each ration. The probable error of field experiments is investigated by two independent methods, and found to be about 5 per cent, of the crop. This figure is shown to be independent of the size of the plot employed, provided this is acre or larger. A table is given showing the number of duplicate plots which must be employed to give any desired precision in the result. It is also suggested that accurate results may be obtained by employing large numbers of very small plots, even as small as one square yard. This method is useful for nursery work in testing the cropping power of new varieties of cereals where very little seed is available.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probable error of field experiments was about 5 per cent of the crop.

Taxon
cerealse1
Outcome
probable error of field experimentse0
Value
5 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“The probable error of field experiments is investigated by two independent methods, and found to be about 5 per cent, of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“new varieties of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1310 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The approximately 5 per cent field error was independent of plots at least an acre in size.

Taxon
cerealse2
Outcome
independent of the size of the plote0
Value
5 per cente1
Qualifier
acre or largere0

Verbatim

e0

“This figure is shown to be independent of the size of the plot employed, provided this is acre or larger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“The probable error of field experiments is investigated by two independent methods, and found to be about 5 per cent, of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–842 · show in text ↑
e2

“new varieties of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1310 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many plots as small as one square yard may yield accurate results for cereal nursery trials.

Taxon
cerealse1
Outcome
accurate resultse0
Value
one square yarde0

Verbatim

e0

“accurate results may be obtained by employing large numbers of very small plots, even as small as one square yard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“nursery work in testing the cropping power of new varieties of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1310 · show in text ↑