Paper · 2009 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization on growth and nutrient uptake of two different cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) genotypes exposed to drought stress

E Neumann; and George

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the present investigation, the effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) fungal root colonization on nutrient uptake, growth and soil water depletion of cowpea plants exposed to a drought stress period was studied in a greenhouse experiment. Arbuscular mycorrhizal and non-AM plants of an old, local variety from Brazil 'Carioca', and of the breeding improved cultivar 'Epace-10' were exposed to 24 days of drought, with or without a subsequent period of water resupply. Control plants remained well watered throughout the growth period. The AM symbiosis greatly enhanced nutrient uptake of drought stressed plants. However, water uptake, growth and net photosynthesis were unaffected by AM root colonization during drought stress. Recovery after water resupply was much faster when plants were inoculated with AM, probably due to an improved plant nutritional status. The cultivar Epace-10 was much more dependent on the AM symbiosis for growth and nutrient uptake compared with Carioca in all irrigation treatments. Only when roots were AM colonized, Epace-10 plants were able to recover from drought stress after water resupply. Our study suggests that the AM symbiosis constitutes an important strategy by which leguminous plants overcome periods of drought. Under conditions of low soil water and P availability, the presence of AM fungal propagules in the field soil appears to be a prerequisite for successful cultivation of cowpea, particularly with respect to the breeding improved cultivar Epace-10.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis greatly enhanced nutrient uptake in drought-stressed cowpea.

Treatment
AM symbiosise0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizalt0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AM symbiosis greatly enhanced nutrient uptake of drought stressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization on growth and nutrient uptake of two different cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) genotypes exposed to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM colonization did not affect cowpea water uptake, growth or net photosynthesis during drought.

Treatment
AM root colonizatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizalt0symbiont
Outcome
water uptake, growth and net photosynthesise0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water uptake, growth and net photosynthesis were unaffected by AM root colonization during drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization on growth and nutrient uptake of two different cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) genotypes exposed to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cowpea recovered more rapidly after water resupply.

Treatment
inoculated with AMe0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
Recovery after water resupplye0
Direction
much fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery after water resupply was much faster when plants were inoculated with AM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute faster recovery probably to improved plant nutrition.

Outcome
Recovery after water resupplye0
Qualifier
improved plant nutritional statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery after water resupply was much faster when plants were inoculated with AM, probably due to an improved plant nutritional status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epace-10 depended more on AM symbiosis for growth than Carioca across irrigation treatments.

Material
Epace-10e0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
much more dependente0
Comparator
Cariocae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Epace-10 was much more dependent on the AM symbiosis for growth and nutrient uptake compared with Carioca in all irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epace-10 depended more on AM symbiosis for nutrient uptake than Carioca across irrigation treatments.

Material
Epace-10e0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
much more dependente0
Comparator
Cariocae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Epace-10 was much more dependent on the AM symbiosis for growth and nutrient uptake compared with Carioca in all irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epace-10 recovered from drought after water resupply only with AM-colonized roots.

Material
Epace-10e0
Treatment
AM colonizede0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
recover from drought stresse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only when roots were AM colonized, Epace-10 plants were able to recover from drought stress after water resupply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend AM fungal propagules for successful cowpea cultivation under low soil water and phosphorus, especially Epace-10.

Material
Epace-10e0
Interactor
AM fungal propagulese0symbiont
Outcome
presence of AM fungal propagules in the field soile0
Qualifier
low soil water and P availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of low soil water and P availability, the presence of AM fungal propagules in the field soil appears to be a prerequisite for successful cultivation of cowpea, particularly with respect to the breeding improved cultivar Epace-10.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1507 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.