Paper · 2015 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

The effect of foliar application of methanol on productivity and fruit quality of grapevine cv. Flame Seedless

Ramadan, T.; Omran, Y. A. M. M.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless. The content of chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids and total carbohydrates increased after methanol application. Foliar application of aqueous methanol was very effective increasing the number of leaves per shoot and leaf area. Furthermore, 30 % methanol increased significantly the number of stomata of developing leaves at the first application time (shoot length: 20-30 cm) while 10, 30, 40 and 50 % methanol solutions were more effective at the second application date (prebloom). Increasing the chlorophyll content, the leaf area and the number of stomata per unit leaf area by methanol application increased net productivity of vines. There was a highly significant positive correlation between total yield, chlorophyll and carbohydrates content. Generally, all methanol treatments significantly increased length and diameter of shoots and internode length at both application dates. Application of methanol increased total soluble solids (TSS), the TSS/acid ratio and total anthocyanins in berry skins but decreased total acidity. Most significant effects were obtained by spraying 30 % methanol at the two application dates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol application increased the content of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
methanol applicatione1
Outcome
content of chlorophyll a and b, carotenoidse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The content of chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids and total carbohydrates increased after methanol application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol application increased total carbohydrate content in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
methanol applicatione1
Outcome
total carbohydratese1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The content of chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids and total carbohydrates increased after methanol application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of aqueous methanol increased the number of leaves per shoot and leaf area in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
Foliar application of aqueous methanole2
Outcome
number of leaves per shoot and leaf areae2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar application of aqueous methanol was very effective increasing the number of leaves per shoot and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

30% methanol significantly increased the number of stomata of developing grapevine leaves at the first application time.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Organ / stage
developing leavese3
Treatment
30 % methanole3
Outcome
number of stomata of developing leavese3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
at the first application time (shoot length: 20-30 cm)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“30 % methanol increased significantly the number of stomata of developing leaves at the first application time (shoot length: 20-30 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10, 30, 40 and 50% methanol solutions were more effective at the second application date (prebloom) in grapevine.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
10, 30, 40 and 50 % methanol solutionse4
Outcome
more effectivee4
Direction
more effectivee4
Qualifier
at the second application date (prebloom)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“while 10, 30, 40 and 50 % methanol solutions were more effective at the second application date (prebloom)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol application increased net productivity of grapevines through higher chlorophyll content, leaf area and stomata per unit leaf area.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
methanol applicatione5
Outcome
net productivity of vinese5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the chlorophyll content, the leaf area and the number of stomata per unit leaf area by methanol application increased net productivity of vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–730 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield of grapevine was positively and highly significantly correlated with chlorophyll and carbohydrate content.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Compound
chlorophylle6
Outcome
total yielde6
Direction
positivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was a highly significant positive correlation between total yield, chlorophyll and carbohydrates content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All methanol treatments significantly increased the length and diameter of grapevine shoots and internode length at both application dates.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
all methanol treatmentse7
Outcome
length and diameter of shoots and internode lengthe7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
at both application datese7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“Generally, all methanol treatments significantly increased length and diameter of shoots and internode length at both application dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol application increased total soluble solids, the TSS/acid ratio and total anthocyanins in grapevine berry skins.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Organ / stage
berry skinse1
Treatment
Application of methanole1
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), the TSS/acid ratio and total anthocyanins in berry skinse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of methanol increased total soluble solids (TSS), the TSS/acid ratio and total anthocyanins in berry skins but decreased total acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol application decreased total acidity of grapevine berries.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Treatment
Application of methanole1
Outcome
total aciditye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 on 6-year-old grapevine cv. Flame Seedless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of methanol increased total soluble solids (TSS), the TSS/acid ratio and total anthocyanins in berry skins but decreased total acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1127 · show in text ↑

methanol · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

methanol · yield · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.