Paper · 2010 · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Influence of water stress on the glucosinolate profile of Brassica oleracea var. italica and the performance of Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae

M.A.M. Khan; Christian Ulrichs; Inga Mewis

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
97
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Drought stress alters the chemical composition of plants, which can influence their tolerance to insect herbivory. To evaluate plant chemical responses to drought stress, broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck (Brassicaceae), was grown under well‐watered, drought, and water‐logged conditions. The glucosinolate (GS) levels and the performance of two aphid species, the specialist Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) and the generalist Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (both Hemiptera: Aphididae), in relation to water stress conditions were studied. High Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis showed that water stress changed the levels of GS in broccoli plants. Plants grown for 2 weeks under drought stress were significantly smaller and showed decreased levels of total GS when compared with GS contents of well‐watered plants, whereas water‐logged conditions led to a slight increase in the GS contents. A substantial decrease in indolyl GS was detected in water‐deficient plants, whereas aliphatic GS decreased slightly. Analysis of sugar levels in phloem sap of broccoli plants revealed that plants under water‐logged conditions contained the highest amounts of sugars followed by drought‐stressed and well‐watered plants. The two aphid species responded differently to water stress‐induced changes in their host plants. Significantly larger populations of M. persicae were recorded on plants with a limited water supply than on plants grown under well‐watered or water‐logged conditions. Brevicoryne brassicae was less affected by water stress, and similar population sizes were found on plants that were subject to different treatments. Analysis of covariance showed a significant effect of the plants’ water condition but no significant effect of GS content on the performance of M. persicae . However, the specialist B. brassicae remained unaffected by changes induced under water stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress changed broccoli glucosinolate levels.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
levels of GSe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress changed the levels of GS in broccoli plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced broccoli plant size versus well-watered plants.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
smallere0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown for 2 weeks under drought stress were significantly smaller and showed decreased levels of total GS when compared with GS contents of well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli plants. Plants grown for 2 weeks under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased total glucosinolates versus well-watered plants.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
levels of total GSe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown for 2 weeks under drought stress were significantly smaller and showed decreased levels of total GS when compared with GS contents of well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli plants. Plants grown for 2 weeks under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging slightly increased glucosinolate content.

Treatment
water‐logged conditionse0
Outcome
GS contentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water‐logged conditions led to a slight increase in the GS contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“water‐logged conditions led to a slight increase in the GS contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency substantially decreased indolyl glucosinolates.

Treatment
water‐deficiente0
Outcome
indolyl GSe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A substantial decrease in indolyl GS was detected in water‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“A substantial decrease in indolyl GS was detected in water‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency slightly decreased aliphatic glucosinolates.

Treatment
water‐deficiente1
Outcome
aliphatic GSe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aliphatic GS decreased slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“A substantial decrease in indolyl GS was detected in water‐deficient plants, whereas aliphatic GS decreased slightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli phloem sugar levels were highest under waterlogging, then drought, then well-watered conditions.

Organ / stage
phloem sape1
Treatment
water‐logged conditionse0
Outcome
amounts of sugarse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
drought‐stressed and well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants under water‐logged conditions contained the highest amounts of sugars followed by drought‐stressed and well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analysis of sugar levels in phloem sap of broccoli plants revealed that plants under water‐logged conditions contained the highest amounts of sugars followed by drought‐stressed and well‐watered plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Myzus persicae populations were significantly larger under limited water supply than well-watered or waterlogged conditions.

Treatment
limited water supplye0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
populations of M. persicaee0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
well‐watered or water‐logged conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly larger populations of M. persicae were recorded on plants with a limited water supply than on plants grown under well‐watered or water‐logged conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly larger populations of M. persicae were recorded on plants with a limited water supply than on plants grown under well‐watered or water‐logged conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brevicoryne brassicae populations were similar across water treatments.

Treatment
water stresse0
Interactor
Brevicoryne brassicaeBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
population sizese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
different treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brevicoryne brassicae was less affected by water stress, and similar population sizes were found on plants that were subject to different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1653 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brevicoryne brassicae was less affected by water stress, and similar population sizes were found on plants that were subject to different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant water condition significantly affected Myzus persicae performance.

Treatment
plants’ water conditione0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
performance of M. persicaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant effect of the plants’ water condition but no significant effect of GS content on the performance of M. persicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1809 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant effect of the plants’ water condition but no significant effect of GS content on the performance of M. persicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucosinolate content had no significant effect on Myzus persicae performance.

Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Compound
GSe0
Outcome
performance of M. persicaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant effect of GS content on the performance of M. persicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1809 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant effect of GS content on the performance of M. persicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli, Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–230 · show in text ↑

drought · Brevicoryne brassicae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.